Job prospects unclear for the ousted Blagojevich By DEANNA BELLAND
Filed under: What Liberal Media?
February 3, 2009 • 11:16 pm 0
Job prospects unclear for the ousted Blagojevich By DEANNA BELLAND
Filed under: What Liberal Media?
December 26, 2008 • 10:32 pm 0
Apparently, George W. Bush, also known as “Satan” to the junk-bond New York Times, isn’t such a bad guy after all!
NY Times: Expansion of Clinics Shapes Bush Legacy
Although the number of uninsured and the cost of coverage have ballooned under his watch, President Bush leaves office with a health care legacy in bricks and mortar: he has doubled federal financing for community health centers, enabling the creation or expansion of 1,297 clinics in medically underserved areas.
For those in poor urban neighborhoods and isolated rural areas, including Indian reservations, the clinics are often the only dependable providers of basic services like prenatal care, childhood immunizations, asthma treatments, cancer screenings and tests for sexually transmitted diseases.
As a crucial component of the health safety net, they are lauded as a cost-effective alternative to hospital emergency rooms, where the uninsured and underinsured often seek care.
Filed under: What Liberal Media?
December 25, 2008 • 12:19 pm 0
Regarding the recent scandal involving Wall Street adviser Bernard Madoff, who defrauded investors from $50 billion, the A.P. wrote an entire story on Jews and how frightened they are that the recent Madoff scandal might inspire people with already bigoted opinions against Jews. In the words of the A.P., it’s “particularly wrenching for Jews.”
Wow, what a great sense of priorities! Fortunately those frightened Jews and the Marxists at the Associated Press aren’t too concerned with other matters like sympathizing with, you know, the people who Madoff defrauded, many of whom were Jewish.
Associated Press: Some Jews fear Madoff case stokes anti-Semitism — Madoff scandal fits profile of `affinity fraud,’ proves particularly wrenching for Jews By Jennifer Peltz
Filed under: Crazy liberals, What Liberal Media? , Bernard Madoff, Crazy liberals, Jews, priorities, Thierry de la Villehuchet, What Liberal Media?
December 21, 2008 • 8:49 pm 0
IBD: Caroline Palin By INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY
As the Kennedy du jour tours New York seeking Hillary’s seat, will she be asked tough questions by Couric, Gibson, et al.?
Kennedy’s interest in New York politics has been minimal. As the Daily News has reported, she skipped about half the 38 contested elections held since she registered to vote in New York in 1988, including four Democratic primaries in mayoral elections won three times by Republicans.
She also missed voting in the race for the Senate seat she now seeks. Seems she was doing something else in 1994, when Daniel Patrick Moynihan was running for re-election.
The New York Times described her qualifications thus: “Ms. Kennedy has much going for her. As a public figure, she carries the glamour and poignancy of her family.” Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post gushes that our “tragic national princess,” the “Cinderella Kennedy” is “finally rewarded” for “her years of quiet dignity.” First a pony, now a Senate seat.
Contrast such swooning over Caroline with the full-court press the media put on Sarah Palin. The Alaska governor’s experience, interest in her state and political involvement make Caroline look like a Chihuahua next to Palin’s pit bull, with or without lipstick. We doubt if Katie Couric will ask Camelot’s heiress how much she spends on her wardrobe. [Or what newspapers she reads -- Ed.]
As we have noted, Caroline’s chief accomplishments seem to have been organizing a rock concert in Central Park to raise private money for New York City public schools, serving on the board of a ballet company and heading up Barack Obama’s vice presidential selection committee, a panel that labored mightily and produced a Joe Biden.
Palin, by contrast, is a former small-town mayor and the governor of a major energy-rich state. She can hunt, kill and cook. Not many working moms can handle an automatic rifle, run a state and bake cookies too.
She runs a government of 24,000 employees, oversees 14 statewide Cabinet agencies and manages a $10 billion budget. She set in motion a $40 billion pipeline to bring Alaskan natural gas to the lower 48 states. And she squeezed the oil companies to give every Alaskan a $1,200 share in her state’s energy wealth.
Sarah not only voted in Alaskan elections, but also won a few, starting with her home town of Wasilla. She defeated a sitting Republican governor in the primary and a two-term former Democratic governor in the general election. No one had to appoint her.
No wonder people are cynical about politics. Merit counts less than one’s bloodline. What’s in a name? Everything, it seems .
Filed under: What Liberal Media? , arrogance, Caroline Kennedy, Charles Gibson, experience, Katie Couric, What Liberal Media?
• 3:31 pm 0

Imagine if some malcontent threw his shoes at Barack Obama.
The New York Times would surely be in a state of rage, demanding to know why the Secret Service failed protect Obama. It would direct personal attacks at the man who throw his shoes at Obama. In short, the media would display a self-righteous fury not seen Governor Sarah Palin mocked the intentionally nebulous concept of “community organizer.”
If that President attacked was Barack Obama, The New York Times would never publish stories noting the style of the shoe, or that there has been an increased demand for the shoe. We’d never be informed of name of the shoe, Ducati Model 271. Nor would we be told about those irony-deaf shoe companies which, while increasing production of the shoe due to increased demand, would be printing “five thousand posters advertising the shoes, on their way to the Middle East and Turkey, proclaim ‘Goodbye Bush, Welcome Democracy’ in Turkish, English and Arabic.” The entire culture would be derided as having some bizarre foot or shoe fetish.
But the President attacked was not Obama; the President was a Republican. All abuse of George W. Bush has been welcome, celebrated, defended as “patriotic.” Since 2000, it has been the only standard for the Stalinists who control the American media.
NY Times: ‘Bush Shoe’ Gives Firm a Footing in the Market By SEBNEM ARSU
Filed under: What Liberal Media? , foot fetish, George W. Bush, New York Times, shoe fetish, shoes, What Liberal Media?
December 20, 2008 • 1:27 am 0
Fox: If Caroline’s Last Name Was Palin By Andrea Tantaros
What has she done in her career? Does she have the experience to govern? Isn’t she just a name and a pretty face in expensive clothes? All questions asked by Democrats (I’m being nice) regarding Sarah Palin as McCain’s pick for Vice President.
But Caroline Kennedy -– similarly an intriguing, attractive outsider decked in designer duds and a thin resume — isn’t put under the same kind of scrutiny. Apparently, qualifications don’t matter to the left as long as you don’t hunt moose.
The left is just plain giddy with excitement over a return to Camelot and the New York press corps, the most selectively tough in the business, is following suit. One this is certain: if Kennedy’s last name were Palin she wouldn’t be anointed.
I would add that Palin also had to deal with regional bigotry.
I guess if you go to certain schools, come from a certain state, and have a certain last name, you’re not subject to scrutiny.
Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , Caroline Kennedy, New York, Sarah Palin, Senate, What Liberal Media?
December 13, 2008 • 4:21 am 0
Business and Media Institute: The Media’s Top 10 Worst Economic Myths of 2008 — BMI’s collection of outrageous economic bias for the entire year: From the salmonella outbreak to the media’s call for a new, New Deal.
Filed under: What Liberal Media? , bias, economy, myths, New Deal, What Liberal Media?
December 10, 2008 • 7:29 pm 0
What a pity.
Media Bistro: NPR Layoffs Looming?
Filed under: What Liberal Media?
December 5, 2008 • 2:39 pm 0
NRO: Parallel Lives by Victor Davis Hanson
Remember why most Republicans, other than Colin Powell, abandoned the soon-to-be convicted Ted Stevens. And the names of Mark Foley and Larry Craig are now understandably infamous. It is altogether fine and proper that Republicans turned on their own miscreants, who needed to be turned on for their various misdeeds.
But why in the world is Rep. Charles Rangel still the Chairman of the House Ways and Means committee which oversees U.S. tax policy — especially at this critical juncture in our nation’s financial history?
I say “Why?” not out of sarcasm, but out of real bewilderment: Rangel’s record of financial and ethical improprieties is no longer a matter of hypocrisy, but rather one of probable criminality.
Let us count the ways: (1) Rangel paid no federal income tax on some $75,000 in rental income from his Caribbean villa — that lapse would result in a felony tax-evasion charge for the rest of us who dared to try that year in and year out. (2) Something called Nabobs Industries gave $1 million to something called the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at City College of New York — and, apparently in exchange, got tens of millions of dollars in tax waivers from Rangel’s committee. [...] (3) Rangel seems to be claiming his New York campaign office as his home in order to continue to garner rent-control exemptions, improperly saving him thousands of dollars through aggregate subsidies. That someone who oversees the drafting of American tax policies and regulation cannot follow them himself is now a statement of fact, not baseless slander.
Filed under: Crazy liberals, Democrats Behaving Badly, What Liberal Media? , Charles Rangel, Larry Craig, Mark Foley, tax evasion, Ted Stevens
December 4, 2008 • 11:08 pm 0
Yes, the economy is partly to blame for the financial troubles of mainstream newsmedia, but the American public doesn’t exactly the libs with microphones either.
Associated Press: US newspaper ad sales fall a record $2B in 3QBy
U.S. newspaper advertising revenue collapsed by nearly $2 billion, or 18 percent, in the third quarter, according to the Newspaper Association of America, an industry group. Even online ad revenue made a small U-turn for the second quarter in a row.
Filed under: What Liberal Media?
• 12:43 am 0
November 24, 2008 • 3:58 pm 0
“What liberal media?” — Eric Alterman
Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (140 Cases) by Scott Thong
Filed under: Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , Sarah Palin, Scott Thong, What Liberal Media?
November 21, 2008 • 2:20 pm 0
November 20, 2008 • 1:41 pm 0
In a list of the 30 “Greatest Conspiracy Theories,” the UK’s Telegraph lists doubters of global warming (“global warning is a hoax”) among a list that includes “Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen,” “Shakespeare was somebody else,” “Elvis Presley faked his own death,” and “The Illuminati and the New World Order.”

29. Global warming is a hoax — Some climate change doubters believe that man-made global warming is a conspiracy designed to soften up the world’s population to higher taxation, controls on lifestyle and more authoritarian government. These sceptics [sic] cite a fall in global temperatures since last year and a levelling [sic] off in the rise in temperature since 1998 as evidence.
Picture: BLOOMBERG
Actually, there is plenty more evidence against man-made global warming.
E-mail: telegrapheditorial@telegraph.co.uk
Letters for publication in The Daily Telegraph can be sent to dtletters@telegraph.co.uk
Letters for publication in The Sunday Telegraph can be sent to stletters@telegraph.co.uk
Filed under: Environmentalism, What Liberal Media?