The Sisyphus Files

Icon

What Liberal Media: If Caroline’s Last Name Was Palin

Fox: If Caroline’s Last Name Was Palin By Andrea Tantaros

What has she done in her career? Does she have the experience to govern? Isn’t she just a name and a pretty face in expensive clothes? All questions asked by Democrats (I’m being nice) regarding Sarah Palin as McCain’s pick for Vice President.

But Caroline Kennedy -– similarly an intriguing, attractive outsider decked in designer duds and a thin resume — isn’t put under the same kind of scrutiny. Apparently, qualifications don’t matter to the left as long as you don’t hunt moose.

The left is just plain giddy with excitement over a return to Camelot and the New York press corps, the most selectively tough in the business, is following suit. One this is certain: if Kennedy’s last name were Palin she wouldn’t be anointed.

I would add that Palin also had to deal with regional bigotry.

I guess if you go to certain schools, come from a certain state, and have a certain last name, you’re not subject to scrutiny.

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , , , , ,

Sarah Palin’s Church Burned, Stalinist Media Yawns

Thankfully the church recently burned was not that of Barack Obama, or it would be a national story. Since Sarah Palin, a Republican, is a member of this church, then it does not really matter.

Thank you, libs. Your sense of fairness and objectivity is a beacon of light in the darkness.

AP: ATF: Accelerant poured around Palin’s church

Filed under: Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , ,

The Real John McCain Returns

McCain scolds GOP for whacking Obama By MIKE ALLEN

George Stephanopoulos asked: “The chairman of the Republican National Committee, Mike Duncan, has been highly critical of the way President- elect Obama has dealt with this. He’s had a statement every single day, saying that the Obama team should reveal all contacts they’ve had with Governor [Rod] Blagojevich. He says that Obama’s promise of transparency to the American people is now being tested. Do you agree with that?”

McCain replied: “I think that the Obama campaign should and will give all information necessary. You know, in all due respect to the Republican National Committee and anybody — right now, I think we should try to be working constructively together, not only on an issue such as this, but on the economy stimulus package, reforms that are necessary. And so, I don’t know all the details of the relationship between President-elect Obama’s campaign or his people and the governor of Illinois, but I have some confidence that all the information will come out. It always does, it seems to me.”

Oh yes. The truth always comes out if Obama is involved. It just gets promptly buried.

How does McCain expect Dems and Republicans will “work constructively together” when one side is (not surprisingly) running from or trying to hide the truth?

This is classic McCain. Make an Oprahfied comment while backstabbing his supporters. What a flake this man is.

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin

Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection

“What liberal media?” — Eric Alterman

ramirez-oct312008

Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (140 Cases) by Scott Thong

Filed under: Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , , ,

With Obama Safely Elected, Talk Shows Suddenly Interested in Sarah Palin

Liberals are transparency personified.

Recall that Oprah Winfrey would only invite Sarah Palin on her overrated talk show after November 4th (“I would love to have her on after the campaign is over.”) . Her Oprahness invited Barack Obama on her show not once, however, but twice.

Now that her ObaMessiah is safely in the White House (almost), guess who Oprah would now love to have as a guest on her overrated talk show?

Hopefully, Palin will tell Oprah to kcuf herself.

Oprah, Leno, Letterman: What’s Palin to do next? by MICHAEL R. BLOOD

Communist News Network: Palin’s star burns brightly as Oprah calls

Filed under: Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , , ,

It’s Hard to Quit Cold-Turkey: Infantile Liberals Find New Excuse to Mock Sarah Palin

Apparently some people think that Thanksgiving turkeys come from the Turkey Fairy.

A note to Democrats and liberals: we got the message. You don’t like Sarah Palin and you really hate the conservative values which she defends. I’d bet a whole lot of money that does not like you or your Communism either. Too bad she is too classy to say so publicly.

In case you missed the memo or were otherwise comatose, Governor Sarah Palin ran with Senator John McCain for the U.S. Presidency. They lost that election on November 4th to Senators Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Thus, unless your objective is to get closer to your inner sadist, even discussing Palin (atleast at this point) is bizarre at best.

Turkey jive: Palin-bashers strike again; Update: NYTimes editorial board decries “executions” By Michelle Malkin

Columnist Mark Steyn responds to this stupidity:

If it bleeds, it leads [Mark Steyn]

I didn’t think I could like Sarah Palin more than I do, but the nancy boys at MSNBC bleating all over the screen about the Great Turkey Carnage is hilarious. This is a great caption:

TURKEYS DIE AS GOVERNOR PALIN TAKES QUESTIONS FROM MEDIA

Or was it: MEDIA DIE AS GOVERNOR PALIN TAKES QUESTIONS FROM TURKEYS.

After she’s sworn in in 2013, I hope President Palin arranges for a ritual turkey slaughter to be going on behind her at every press conference, if only during David Shuster’s questions.

Tim Blair has a good round-up of reaction.

This media has no clue how petty and desperate they appear (and no clue generally). It’s laughably obvious that they have NOTHING to pin on Palin, so they must resort to associating her with turkeys being slaughtered a week before THANKSGIVING.

Worse of all: these same children screaming about turkeys being killed support the wholesale slaughter of unborn babies at any time and for any reason.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , , , ,

You Don’t Say

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, John McCain/Sarah Palin

How Liberals Value Privacy: “Joe the Plumber” Illegally Investigated by SIX AGENCIES

Filed under: Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , ,

Thank Sarah Palin for Her Efforts and Grace

Governor Sarah Palin’s contact information is below (for those who intend on being very polite).

E-mail Gov. Palin at the Alaska Governor’s webpage.

Correspondence such as letters, packages, and paperwork should be addressed to the Juneau Governor’s Office.

Juneau Office
Alaska State Capitol Building, Third Floor
P.O. Box 110001
Juneau, AK 99811-0001

Phone (907) 465-3500
Fax (907) 465-3532

State Info (907) 465-2111

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , ,

McCain Staffers Mock Palin

How classy can you get…

The Cowardly Character Assassination of Sarah Palin by Michelle Malkin

[McCain staffers] turned to Newsweek and Fox News to spread petty rumors about Palin’s intellect and character. The magazine peddled anecdotes from sources horrified that Palin greeted top advisers at her hotel room — gasp! — “wearing nothing but a towel” and “wet hair.” Fox News reporter Carl Cameron breathlessly reported that his unnamed McCain sources told him Palin lacked “a degree of knowledgeability necessary to be a running mate” because, they claimed, she didn’t know which countries were parties to the North American Free Trade Agreement and “didn’t understand that Africa was a continent, rather than a series, a country just in itself.”

Let’s assume for a moment that the McCain rumormongers are telling the truth about Palin (and I don’t believe they are). Who would it damn more: Palin, or McCain and his vetters, who greenlighted her for the vice presidential nomination? Don’t need a fancy Ivy League degree to figure that one out.

[...]

Hollywood savaged Palin. Journalists mocked her. Liberal blogs slimed her. Opponents cursed her, Photoshopped her, hacked her e-mail, hanged her in effigy, called her bigot, Bible-thumper and bimbo, and attacked her husband and children. But nothing Palin endured during the election season compares to the treatment she’s receiving from these backstabbing blabbermouths who worked on the same campaign she poured herself into over the last three months.

Sarah Palin worked her heart out. She energized tens of thousands to come out when they would have otherwise stayed home. She touched countless families. I didn’t agree with everything she said on the campaign trail. But she vigorously defended the Second Amendment and the sanctity of life more eloquently in practice than any of the educated conservative aristocracy. And she did it all with a tirelessness and an infectious optimism that defied the shameless, bottomless attempts by elites in both parties to bring her and her family down.

palin-cute4

Sarah Palin was the only reason McCain ever had a chance to win. She was sharp, intelligent, elegant, and despite a constant assault of outrageous attacks against her and her family, she displayed much grace and class.

She is an asset to conservatives.

Meanwhile, instead of thanking Palin for doing the real campaigning that a cowardly McCain felt beneath his dignity, she is attacked by her own side.

She is a class act, and we’re lucky she’s on our side. Hopefully, she will return in 2012, although who can blame her if she did not?

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , ,

Why Did McCain/Palin Lose? Blame John McCain

and blame only John McCain, who ran the most cowardly, weak, self-destructive, Oprahfied campaign in my memory.

HOW MCCAIN DEFEATED MCCAIN By Don Feder

Some will fault the leftist media, which lost any sense of balance and objectivity and practically panted over the Kenyan-American.

Others will point to the huge disparity in fundraising. Obama outspent McCain by nearly three to one. Still, if it was only about money, John Forbes Kerry – who’s married to Ft. Knox – would have won the 2004 campaign. As a friend put it, “McCain failed to raise the money to project the message he didn’t have.”

There are those who will attribute McCain’s defeat to the unpopularity of outgoing President George W. Bush, or the financial meltdown for which Republicans unfairly took the fall, or the fact that only once in the post-war era has a two-term president been succeeded by a member of his party.

[...]

But, in the final analysis, Republicans lost because they nominated their weakest candidate. And McCain lost because he’s McCain.

As a member of Club Capitol Hill, McCain was best known for cooperating with Democrats, reaching across the proverbial aisle to embrace big government halfway. Perhaps he’d spent so much time forging coalitions with the left that he’d forgotten how to fight it — if he ever knew.

For the past two decades, McCain basked in the adoration of the mainstream media. He was their pet Republican. They honored him with the accolade “maverick” — their term of endearment for a Republican who specializes in betraying his own party (as McCain did with Campaign Finance Reform). Then, when the bigger, better deal came along, The New York Times et al. decided that the former object of their affection was a Republican after all, and hateful to boot.

Of course the Fourth Estate did everything it could to elect Barack Hussein Obama. (To a large extent, he is their creation.) What else is new?

If the media chose our presidents – if they were omnipotent, as many conservatives believe –- why did the GOP win five of the last eight presidential elections? Was the media enamored of Ronald Reagan – infatuated with George W. Bush? [The media does not choose our presidents. Regardless, the media's behavior and treatment toward conservatives is utterly criminal and without scruples. -- Ed.]

[...]

McCain did a poor impression of a conservative.

[...]

Ultimately, the Republican standard-bearer chose sensitivity over the presidency.

[...]

No, what McCain did was to betray his supporters by running a campaign without the brains, heart and guts to win.

Picking Sarah Palin as his running mate was McCain’s first and last smart move. Other than that, McCain’s campaign was much like the rest of his political career – equivocal, hesitant, passionless and lacking any real focus or genuine commitment to principles.

More than a partisan media, Bush’s ratings, the Fannie-Mae fiasco, and Democratic fundraising, John McCain is responsible for the defeat of John McCain.

Very true. McCain had no will to fight, unless the fight was against his supporters, unless the fight was against Republicans or conservatives. Then he was all fight.

But against Obama and Biden, flaky McCain thought he was a guest on a game show. In his refusal to simply state facts about his opponent which were already known by much of the public, he sabotaged his campaign and his country. Shame on him. He does not belong in the Republican Party so much as he belongs on the Oprah Winfrey Show.

Better candidates? Fred Thompson. Tom Tancredo. Mitt Romney. Shit, even Rudy Giuliani would have been better.

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin

Show the President-Elect the Same Courtesy They Showed George W. Bush

The Reign of Lame Falls Mainly on McCain by Ann Coulter

[W]e’re all winners because we will never again have to hear McCain say, “my friends.”
[...]
This was such an enormous Democratic year that even John Murtha won his congressional seat in Pennsylvania after calling his constituents racists. It turns out they’re not racists — they’re retards. Question: What exactly would one have to say to alienate Pennsylvanians? That Joe Paterno should retire?
[...]
[W]hy should Republican activists slave away working for McCain when he has personally, viciously attacked: John O’Neill and the Swift Boat Veterans, National Right to Life director Doug Johnson, evangelical pastors Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and John Hagee, various conservative talk radio hosts, the Tennessee Republican Party and on and on and on?
[...]
I keep trying to get Democrats to take my advice (stop being so crazy), but they never listen to me. Why do Republicans take the advice of their enemies?

How many times do we have to run this experiment before Republican primary voters learn that “moderate,” “independent,” “maverick” Republicans never win, and right-wing Republicans never lose?

Indeed, the only good thing about McCain is that he gave us a genuine conservative, Sarah Palin. He’s like one of those insects that lives just long enough to reproduce so that the species can survive. That’s why a lot of us are referring to Sarah as “The One” these days.

Like Sarah Connor in “The Terminator,” Sarah Palin is destined to give birth to a new movement. That’s why the Democrats are trying to kill her. And Arnold Schwarzenegger is involved somehow, too. Good Lord, I’m tired.

After showing nearly superhuman restraint throughout this campaign, which was lost the night McCain won the California primary, I am now liberated to announce that all I care about is hunting down and punishing every Republican who voted for McCain in the primaries.
[...]
For now, we have a new president-elect. In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin

Congratulations

I offer my congratulations to Senator Obama on his victory.

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”H. L. Mencken

“The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with an average voter.” Winston Churchill

“‘E Pluribus Unum’ is no longer our national motto. These three words are: ‘Do For Me.’ As in: What will the government do for me?” — Michelle Malkin

“Politicians have immense power to do harm to the economy. But they have very little power to do good.” – Walter Williams

“Most change in America doesn’t come from politicians. It comes from people inventing things and creating. The telephone, the telegraph, the computer, all those things didn’t come from government. Our world is going to get better and better, as long as we keep the politicians from screwing it up.” — David Boaz

“We should never despair, our Situation before has been unpromising and has changed for the better, so I trust, it will again. If new difficulties arise, we must only put forth new Exertions and proportion our Efforts to the exigency of the times.” -- George Washington

May God bless and protect America.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , ,

If Anyone’s Behaving Selfishly, It is Obama

Obama thinks the majority of Americans are “selfish.”

One ought not be surprised by this comment. Liberals cannot compete on substance or logic, so they must resort to smears, insults, character assassination, and pretend to have a monopoly on decency.

A response from Mark Alexander at Patriot Post:

Wednesday night, Obama said in his infomercial: “Just because I want to spread the wealth around, they call me a socialist. The next thing you know, they will call me a communist because I shared my peanut butter sandwich in kindergarten!”

Of course, Barack Obama isn’t proposing to “share” his sandwich. Instead, he’s proposing to confiscate your sandwich, by force if necessary, and give it to someone he deems more worthy, assuming that you aren’t charitable enough to share it yourself.

Truth is, it’s unlikely Obama ever shared a sandwich with anyone. According to tax records released Wednesday, Barack and Michelle Obama had an average annual income of more than $500,000 between 2000 and 2006, but only gave two percent — 2% — of their income for charitable purposes.**

Further, it turns out that while Obama has been living well in his Georgian mansion on Chicago’s south side, his illegal immigrant aunt has been holed up in public housing on welfare in Boston for the last four years, while other family members live in squalor in the shanties around Nairobi, Kenya.

So much for “spreading the wealth around.”

Ah, and he insisted Sarah Palin has made “a virtue out of selfishness.”

This would be the same Sarah Palin who brought into this world a special needs child, to love and cherish. Sarah and Todd Palin chose a life of dignity for their child. Ponder what “choice” the Obamas would have made had they faced similar circumstances.

Once again, Obama asserts, “You know I, I, I don’t know when, when, uh, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.”***

Egomaniacal self-interest is the centerpiece of Obama’s campaign. As I have written previously, John F. Kennedy, who Obama and his political don John Kerry hold up as their patriarch, closed his 1961 inaugural speech with these famous words: “And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.” However, today, Obama has turned JFK’s national challenge on end, essentially proclaiming, “ask what your country can do for you, not what you can do for your country.”

So, hypocrisy is also a centerpiece of Obama’s campaign.

John McCain and Sarah Palin have a long history of third-person living, serving God and country before themselves.

Mr. Obama — on behalf of all American Patriots, especially those who have served their nation sacrificially, an apology is due, NOW.

Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!

Mark Alexander

_____________

**Obama’s running mate is even more miserly. The Bidens’ income averaged $260,000 over the last 10 years, but they averaged just $650 a year in charitable giving.

***I have consulted forensic linguists who have analyzed Obama’s off-script campaign remarks, and they conclude that the surfeit of verbal non-fluency (stammering) in Obama’s comments are consistent indicators of his intent to deceive.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, John McCain/Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin Cleared in Sham Investigation

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin

Early Voting Fails to Minimize Long Lines; Lots of Fraud is Still Possible, However.

CNN: Excitement, frustration as early voters brave long lines

Voters stand in line Sunday outside an early-voting location in Columbus, Ohio.

Voters stand in line Sunday outside an early-voting location in Columbus, Ohio.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Democrats Behaving Badly: This Month, I’ll Vote in California. Next Month, New Mexico!

Palestra: VOTE FRAUD ALERT: New Mexico, We Have A Problem by Shelby Holliday

As part of our ongoing investigation into issues surrounding voter fraud, we have discovered a VERY disconcerting situation. And this time, it’s not in Ohio.

It looks like out-of-state volunteers and staffers are registering and casting ballots in the battleground state of New Mexico, too.

One example is Shayne Adamski. He lives and works in Los Angeles, CA, is actively involved in politics and was a California delegate at the Democratic National Convention just 2 short months ago. Adamski is also a paid employee on the Obama campaign, and he traveled to New Mexico to help get out the vote in this swing state. All of this is quite admirable.

However, according to the Bernalillo County Clerk, Adamski registered to vote as a resident of Albuquerque on October 5. That’s just 38 days after he was representing the state of California as a delegate on the final day of the Democratic National Convention. He also requested an absentee ballot. (We do not yet know if he cast a ballot, we are waiting to hear from the County Clerk.)

Query: Wouldn’t a single database whereby each state could check in WHICH state each voter is registered alleviate potential for fraud?

Or is that too obvious for this government?

Tiffany Wilson and I traveled to New Mexico with photojournalist Gary Orr to check things out.

We were able to speak with Carlos Sanchez, a spokesperson for the Obama campaign, but he declined to comment on Adamski’s specific situation. Unfortunately, we were unable to speak with Adamski himself due to campaign policy.

What exactly was this “campaign policy”? (Did you ask?) Besides “cover your ass at all times” ?

Since we can’t talk to Adamski directly or get information about him from the campaign, we don’t know whether or not he moved to Albuquerque and/or intends to reside here, but we were curious: are out-of-state campaign workers eligible to claim residency in New Mexico and cast a ballot?

Does not each state have a residency requirement/period of residency prior to voting?

We realize that New Mexico does not abide by the Ohio Revised Code, something we have become very familiar with in the past few weeks. In Ohio, you must be a resident of the state 30 days prior to the election AND have the intention of residing there permanently. Was this the case in New Mexico?

THIRTY DAYS? That’s IT?

We asked the Bernalillo County Clerk Maggie Toulouse Oliver this very question. Contrary to what we have discovered in Ohio, she said that out-of-state volunteers WERE in fact able to register and to vote in New Mexico.

When we asked how this was allowed, she replied: “It’s not that it’s allowed so much as that it’s not enforced. There is really no enforcement mechanism in place to evaluate whether someone’s submitting a registration based on a temporary address.”

Concerning? Yes. [Shelby Holliday, do you always react this casually to the fact that America has become a fuckin' Banana Republic? -- Ed.]

But that’s not the end of the story.

Example #379, 628, 432, 987 of government stupidity.

Imagine a Republican pulling this kind of stunt. Do you think the criminals in the media would be utterly comatose about it?

(Meanwhile, liberals want this same government to RUN OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.)

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals, Democrats Behaving Badly, John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , , , , , , , , ,

For Once, Some Real Hope (for Republicans)

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin ,

Another Endorsement Obama Does Not Need

Science? What science?

Science? What science?

The Goracle returns. For once, I feel rather bad for Senator Obama.

Associated (de)Press(ed): Al Gore returns to Florida to help boost Obama By BRIAN SKOLOFF

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin , ,

Obamamerica: If You Want to Keep the Money You Earned, Senator Barack Thinks You’re “Selfish”

The two-faced Obama has accumulated a stunning about of money to spend on his campaign, but lectures average Americans about “spreading the wealth.” He egomaniacly spent several million dollars on a 30 minute infomercial which told us jack shit, but he lectures average Americans about “spreading wealth.”

And woe to you if you disagree.

Obama’s New Attack on Those Who Don’t Want Higher Taxes: ‘Selfishness’

On the stump this week, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has pushed back against Sen. John McCain’s description of his tax policies.

“The reason that we want to do this, change our tax code, is not because I have anything against the rich,” Obama said in Sarasota, Florida, yesterday. “I love rich people! I want all of you to be rich. Go for it. That’s the America dream, that’s the American way, that’s terrific.

“The point is, though, that — and it’s not just charity, it’s not just that I want to help the middle class and working people who are trying to get in the middle class — it’s that when we actually make sure that everybody’s got a shot – when young people can all go to college, when everybody’s got decent health care, when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month – then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling and everybody is better off. All boats rise. That’s what happened in the 1990s, that’s what we need to restore. And that’s what I’m gonna do as president of the United States of America.

Obama went to Columbia University and Harvard University Law School. (Don’t ask me how he was accepted. He claims he was trashed alot of the time. No, the media did not investigate any of it.) Most assume that Obama’s education must make him intelligent, but if his economic ignorance was mass, he’d produce several black holes by himself. (Yea, I said “black hole.” If you think the term has any racial meaning, please leave my blog now lest you infect it with your retardedness.)

1. Why does Obama think that “making sure that everybody’s got a shot” involve (1) expansion of government and (2) expansion of an already BLOATED welfare state? Has not the free market done this consistently better than anything the government has done, or that a welfare check can do?

2. If “everybody starts spending that money,” the market will adjust to it (i.e., as more people demand more products, so will the price of those products!).

Obama is right about all boats rising. Substitute “prices” for “boats.”

“John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic,” Obama continued. “You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.”

It’s unclear if this was a nod to the Ayn Rand book “The Virtue of Selfishness,” with all that the invocation of Rand implies.

It would seem to be, given the themes of Rand’s work, what happens when independent achievers are demonized.

Which would fit with this description of those who want to keep their hard-earned tax dollars as “selfish.”

Atlas may not be shrugging, but Obama is.

– jpt

This is how liberals deal with conservatives who dare disagree: character assassination.

Citixen X left this comment at ABC:

A lawyer with 2 years in the senate, a questionable background, no military or business experience and happens to read a teleprompter well is likely going to be the next president. A citizen who asked him a simple question about taxes has gone under more scrutiny from the mainstream media than he has.

You have been warned.

Applause to Jake Tapper for actually risking his career to question or criticize his Obamaness.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , ,

Fun with Fraud in Florida — Dead People are “Voting”

WFTV: Dead People Voting Throughout Florida

Thousands of dead Floridians are registered to vote and some in Central Florida had ballots cast in their names long after their deaths.

“That is scary,” said Jim Branch.

Branch’s mother Marjorie died in 2004 but someone voted for her in 2006. Branch had tried to get his mother removed from the voter rolls.

“It was much easier for me calling Social Security and taking her off not getting any more checks here, than it was that (voter registration),”
he sid.

County records show James Santiago voted in the 2006 general election. He too, was dead. His wife, Joann, sees this as an open invitation for voter fraud.

“I think it leaves it open to sign his name, during an election, especially an important one like this year,” said Joann.

Channel Nine discovered 1,636 registered voters in Central Florida are dead.

“This is what makes Supervisors of Elections lose sleep at night,” said Volusia County Supervisor of Elections Ann McFall.

McFall said it used to be easy to clear out voter rolls.

“We had two people who did nothing but cut obituary notices out of the papers,” she said. “That’s how we found out someone died.”

But 2002’s Help America Vote act, which made it easier to register to vote, also made it more difficult to remove voters from the rolls. But Orange County Election Supervisor Bill Cowles doesn’t worry.

“I think the mechanisms are in place. There’s enough checks and balances in place,” he said.

Do either McCain or Obama care about registration/voter fraud?

Anyone? Anyone?

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , ,

The Stalinist Media’s Character Assassination of Sarah Palin

Culture and Media Institute: A Study in Character Assassination: How the TV Networks Have Portrayed Sarah Palin as Dunce or Demon — An analysis of two weeks of coverage of the GOP vice presidential nominee reveals unremitting hostility from the network news. By Colleen Raezler and Brian Fitzpatrick, Culture and Media Institute

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , , ,

Associated Press Appalled! Palin a National Political Figure? How Dare She!

Not going away

Not going away

The Associated (de)Press(ed) frets that Sarah Palin might continue her political career even if she and McCain lose! How dare she not disappear?

AP: Palin suggests she’s a national political figure By BETH FOUHY and John Seewer

Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is looking toward her political future even as her political present has yet to be decided.

In an interview Wednesday with ABC News, the Alaska governor said she believed she and John McCain would win next Tuesday’s election but indicated she wouldn’t disappear from the national political scene if they lose.

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , ,

Polls Tighten and Tighten Some More. ACORN Confused, Shocked

Rasmussen Reports: RASMUSSEN Tight: Obama +3 . . .

IBD: TIPP: Obama +3. . .

Washington Post: Accuracy Of Polls a Question In Itself…

LVRJ: Sample: Forecasts of voting lag, so far…

EIGHTY-FOUR PERCENT SAY THEY’D NEVER LIE TO A POLLSTER by Ann Coulter

Reviewing the polls printed in The New York Times and The Washington Post in the last month of every presidential election since 1976, I found the polls were never wrong in a friendly way to Republicans. When the polls were wrong, which was often, they overestimated support for the Democrat, usually by about 6 to 10 points.

In 1976, Jimmy Carter narrowly beat Gerald Ford 50.1 percent to 48 percent. And yet, on Sept. 1, Carter led Ford by 15 points. Just weeks before the election, on Oct. 16, 1976, Carter led Ford in the Gallup Poll by 6 percentage points — down from his 33-point Gallup Poll lead in August.

Reading newspaper coverage of presidential elections in 1980 and 1984, I found myself paralyzed by the fear that Reagan was going to lose.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan beat Carter by nearly 10 points, 51 percent to 41 percent. In a Gallup Poll released days before the election on Oct. 27, it was Carter who led Reagan 45 percent to 42 percent.

In 1984, Reagan walloped Walter Mondale 58.8 percent to 40 percent, — the largest electoral landslide in U.S. history. But on Oct. 15, The New York Daily News published a poll showing Mondale with only a 4-point deficit to Reagan, 45 percent to 41 percent. A Harris Poll about the same time showed Reagan with only a 9-point lead. The Oct. 19 New York Times/CBS News Poll had Mr. Reagan ahead of Mondale by 13 points. All these polls underestimated Reagan’s actual margin of victory by 6 to 15 points.

In 1988, George H.W. Bush beat Michael Dukakis by a whopping 53.4 percent to 45.6 percent. A New York Times/CBS News Poll on Oct. 5 had Bush leading the Greek homunculus by a statistically insignificant 2 points — 45 percent to 43 percent. (For the kids out there: Before it became a clearinghouse for anti-Bush conspiracy theories, CBS News was considered a credible journalistic entity.)

A week later — or one tank ride later, depending on who’s telling the story — on Oct. 13, Bush was leading Dukakis in The New York Times Poll by a mere 5 points.

Admittedly, a 3- to 6-point error is not as crazily wrong as the 6- to 15-point error in 1984. But it’s striking that even small “margin of error” mistakes never seem to benefit Republicans.

In 1992, Bill Clinton beat the first President Bush 43 percent to 37.7 percent. (Ross Perot got 18.9 percent of Bush’s voters that year.) On Oct. 18, a Newsweek Poll had Clinton winning 46 percent to 31 percent, and a CBS News Poll showed Clinton winning 47 percent to 35 percent.

So in 1992, the polls had Clinton 12 to 15 points ahead, but he won by only 5.3 points.

In 1996, Bill Clinton beat Bob Dole 49 percent to 40 percent. And yet on Oct. 22, 1996, The New York Times/CBS News Poll showed Clinton leading by a massive 22 points, 55 percent to 33 percent.

In 2000, which I seem to recall as being fairly close, the October polls accurately described the election as a virtual tie, with either Bush or Al Gore 1 or 2 points ahead in various polls. But in one of the latest polls to give either candidate a clear advantage, The New York Times/CBS News Poll on Oct. 3, 2000, showed Gore winning by 45 percent to 39 percent.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? ,

Democrats Behaving Badly: Republican Volunteers Sprayed with Pepper Spray

GalaxGazette: Campaign workers attacked By Ben Bomberger

Two people were arrested Monday afternoon after an altercation led to five Republican campaign workers being sprayed with Mace at their headquarters in Galax.

Galax Police Chief Rick Clark said officers were dispatched shortly before 1 p.m. to the Galax Republican headquarters on East Grayson Street when a caller reported someone had sprayed office workers with Mace.

Responding officers arrested Daniel Cason Meinecke, 29, and Cara Annis Hindman, 26, both of Galax.

Meinecke was charged with one count of misdemeanor assault, Hindman was charged with five counts of misdemeanor assault.

Mike Stevens says he and other Republican campaign volunteers were attacked on Monday when they were sprayed with pepper spray after an altercation with two people over campaign signs. Photo by April Wright

Daniel Meinecke, Asshole #1

Daniel Meinecke, Asshole #1

Cara Hindman, Asshole #2

Cara Hindman, Asshole #2

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals, Democrats Behaving Badly, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , , , , ,

Democrats Behaving Badly: Hollywood Moron “Hangs” Palin

Imagine if the most recent liberal asshole, Chad Michael Morisette, had chosen to express himself by hanging an image of Barack Obama (or any other Democrat).

Would that still be “art”?

How would the national media react?

What a Liberal Moron Calls "Art" (Unless It's Obama Hanging)

What a Moron Calls Art

Halloween Palin Prop Sparks Controversy In WeHo

A Halloween decoration showing a mannequin dressed as vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin hanging by a noose from the roof of a West Hollywood home is drawing giggles from some passers-by and gasps of outrage from others.

The mannequin is dressed in brunet wig, glasses and a red business suit. Another mannequin dressed as John McCain emerges from a flaming chimney.

Chad Michael Morisette, who lives in the house, told CBS 2 News that drivers and bus passengers have been stopping to snap pictures of the macabre scene.

Morisette says the effigy would be out of bounds at any other time of year, but it’s within the spirit of Halloween.

He says “it should be seen as art, and as within the month of October. It’s Halloween, it’s time to be scary it’s time to be spooky.”

It’s time to be a liberal moron? Yes, you got that down perfectly.

Notice that the “spirit of Halloween” apparently applies to Republicans only. (Mr. Morisette also had an image of John McCain coming out of “flames.” What a regular Michelangelo, this Chad Michael.)

Is it possible to disagree with Republicans and conservatives with a modicum of logic and class?

Why is it that artists are the last people to understand what art is?

UPDATE: Yes, Carolyn, I am well aware that Obama has been subject to this treatment also. It sucks no matter who does it or who is the object of this lunacy. (No kidding!)

UPDATE II: Palin’s image is now being used (without her permission) to sell a sex toy. Classy. The box states that “this is a parody” as if that absolves them of using someone’s image for profit. And the Photoshop work is bloody awful.

Filed under: Crazy liberals, Democrats Behaving Badly, John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , ,

If SNL Mocked Michelle Obama Instead of Sarah Palin…

The media cannot get enough of the “Saturday Night Live” impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run them and run them to the merriment of all.

Can one imagine “Saturday Night Live” doing weekly send-ups of Michelle Obama and her “I’ve never been proud” of my country, this “just downright mean” America, using a black comedienne to mimic and mock her voice and accent?

“Saturday Night Live” would be facing hate-crime charges.

How do we know? When the New Yorker ran a cartoon of Michelle in an Angela-Davis afro with an AK-47 slung over her shoulder, New Yorker editors had to go on national television to swear they were not mocking Michelle, but the conservatives who have so caricatured Michelle and the Messiah.

Is there a media double standard? You betcha.

Patrick Buchanan

Filed under: Crazy liberals, John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , , , , , , , , , , ,

A Democrat Statistician on the Bias of Polling

VIA VirginiaVirtuacon

I was having dinner a night ago with a friend of mine who is a statistician for a well-regarded private polling company. They do some work for Republicans in California, but most of the work they do is for Democrats or Democrat-leaning operations (Unions, etc.). Anyway, her shop was retained to do a few Presidential polls for targetted [sic] states on behalf of a union so the union could decide where to spend their ad dollars for the last week. They did Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada and Missouri. After mocking the hell out of the voter id spreads used by Rassmussen, Zogby, etc. (and this is coming from a committed Dem who will be voting for Barry O) she said the results of their polling lead her to believe that McCain will definitely win FL, OH, NC, MO and NV. She says Obama definitely wins New Mexico. She said that Colorado and New Hampshire were absolute dead heats. She said she thinks there is a 55% chance Obama holds on in Pennsylvania and a 75% chance McCain wins Virginia. She absolutely laughed at the public polls showing Obama leading Virginia–and pointed out that all of those polls rely on Dem turnout being +4 and as much as +7, when in 2006, Republicans actually had the advantage by +3. She also pointed out that the numbers for Obama in SWVA look absolutely awful and that McCain is running 10 points better then Allen did in NoVa.

Anyway, her companies conclusion is that the election will come down to Colorado, New Hampshire and the Republican leaning district in Maine, which in her opinion might very well decide the Presidency (apparently the district in Nebraska that Obama thought he might be able to get is now off the table). She said she has very little doubt that the public polling is part of a “concerted voter suppression effort” by the MSM. She said IBD/TIPP was the only outfit doing public polling that was “worth a bucket of warm piss”.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, John McCain/Sarah Palin ,

Newt Gingrinch Blasts the Liberal Media

Excellent!

The elite media’s attack on Governor Palin again and again has been factually wrong, intellectually dishonest, totally biased, worthy of the Polish State news media attacking Lech Walesa back in the 1980’s. I mean this is the type of deliberate, vicious, dishonest, total distortion of who Governor Palin is . . .  [T]he American people should realize that the elite media on the Left is so desperate to elect Barack Obama that the view they are giving you of Governor Palin is fundamentally a falsehood.

[...]

If you would look at the coverage Michelle Obama has gotten and the coverage that Cindy McCain has gotten you have to believe that the fix is in. When you look at the magazine covers, the pictures that were taken, again and again, over and over for the last year we have been brainwashed, propagandized, insultingly lectured by the news media.

[...]

I can’t say this too strongly. This is like watching Pravda.

This is a one-sided, vicious, unending dishonest campaign.

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , , ,

McCain Volunteer Invents Attack

I did not post the story on Ashley Todd’s attack when it was published because it was suspicious to me.

I guess my instinct was right.

KDKA: Police: Campaign Volunteer Lied, Injured Self — Ashley Todd told investigators today she “just wanted to tell the truth” — and was neither robbed, nor attacked — Todd, 20, is now facing charges for filing a false report to police

I hope this one gets help. Soon.

More at Michelle Malkin.

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin , , , , , , , ,

"The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them..." -- Thomas Jefferson
"I predict the future happiness of Americans if they can prevent the government wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. " -- Thomas Jefferson
“Journalists are like dogs. When ever anything moves, they begin to bark.” -- Arthur Schopenhauer
"To say that 'wealth in America is so unfairly distributed in America' . . . is grossly misleading when most wealth in the United States is not distributed at all. People create it, earn it, save it, and spend it." -- Thomas Sowell
"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell
"The moment you give up your principles, and your values, you are dead, your culture is dead, your civilization is dead. Period." -- Oriana Fallaci
"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul." – George Bernard Shaw
"There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him." – Robert Heinlein
"A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away." – Barry Goldwater
"America’s abundance was not created by public sacrifices to the common good, but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes." -- Ayn Rand
"The free market punishes irresponsibility. Government rewards it." – Harry Browne
"No one can read our Constitution without concluding that the people who wrote it wanted their government severely limited; the words “no” and “not” employed in restraint of government power occur 24 times in the first seven articles of the Constitution and 22 more times in the Bill of Rights." – Edmund A. Opitz
"It is sobering to reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence." – Charles A. Beard
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." -- John 8:32
"Criticizing these reporters is like booing at the Special Olympics." -- Triumph the Insult Comic Dog

 

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30