The Sisyphus Files

Icon

“What Liberal Media?”: Nothing Could Be Finer Than Shoving Caroline in the Seeenate

Newsbusters: Sweet on Caroline : Bozell Column

The very same media which spent months dismissing former mayor and Gov. Sarah Palin as too inexperienced for national office is now championing a woman whose primary qualification – her only qualification — is her last name. The very same media which still mock Palin’s folksy “you betcha” or her interview with Katie Couric don’t seem to notice when John Fund reports that in one 30-minute interview on the cable news channel New York One, Caroline Kennedy used the slang “you know” a total of 168 times.

Filed under: Crazy liberals , , , , , , , , ,

Pompous Ass Governor Ignores U.S. Senate

Despite warnings by Senate Leaders Harry Reid and Dicky Durbin, Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, the upstanding man accused of attempting to sell a U.S. Senate seat for $, has “appointed” an old Illinois policitician to the position.

Chicago Breaking News: Blagojevich snubs Senate, taps Burris for seat

Brushing aside charges that he tried to sell Illinois’ vacant U.S. Senate seat, Gov. Rod Blagojevich appointed former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris to the post today in defiance of Senate leaders who said they would not admit anyone he selected.

It was an abrupt about-face for Blagojevich, who had said after his Dec. 9 corruption arrest that he favored a special election to find a successor to President-elect Barack Obama. But Blagojevich said he acted after the Democratic-controlled General Assembly declined to approve legislation for a special election.

“Please don’t allow the allegations against me to taint this good and honest man,” Blagojevich said while introducing Burris at a downtown news conference.

Speaking of personal traits, anyone wish to guess the “race” of Mr. Burris?

Meanwhile, the people of Illinois are being denied an opportunity to vote in a replacement, and the Illinois GOP twiddles its thumbs — as usual.

Statement from IL GOP Chairman Andy McKenna on Blagojevich appointment of Burris to US Senate 12/30/2008

“Illinois Republicans were the first to demand Rod Blagojevich have nothing to do with appointing our next United States Senator.

“Because they went back on their word and refused to strip Blagojevich of his appointment power and pass a special election, Illinois Democrats have created yet another constitutional crisis for Illinois.

“Blagojevich Democrat Roland Burris is emblematic of the old-school, pay-to-play culture that has plagued Illinois for generations and this appointment is another embarrassment for the people of Illinois.

“Once again, Blagojevich Democrats have failed the people of Illinois by refusing to strip Rod Blagojevich of his senate appointment power and blocking a vote of the people.”

Yes, because Governor Blagojevich gives a kcuf about the people of Illinois.

Sorry, Mr. McKenna. This simply is not enough. If the tables were turned, liberals would be marching in the streets. Three sentence press releases accomplish nothing.

Filed under: Crazy liberals , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Cult of Obama Quotes

“Pride goes before destruction,a haughty spirit before a fall.” – Proverbs 16:18

“It’s perverse. It’s sending the wrong signal.It’s a combination of political opportunism and political naiveté.”George Hoffer

***

Obama Conversion Stories

“”No one saw him coming, and Christians believe God comes at us from strange angles and places we don’t expect, like Jesus being born in a manger.” — Lawrence Carter

“Many even see in Obama a messiah-like figure, a great soul, and some affectionately call him Mahatma Obama.” — Dinesh Sharma

“We just like to say his name. We are considering taking it as a mantra.” — Chicago Sun-Times

“A Lightworker — An Attuned Being with Powerful Luminosity and High-Vibration Integrity who will actually help usher in a New Way of Being” — Mark Morford

“What Barack Obama has accomplished is the single most extraordinary event that has occurred in the 232 years of the nation’s political history” — Jesse Jackson, Jr.

“This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.” — Barack Obama

“Does it not feel as if some special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?” — Daily Kos

“He communicates God-like energy…” — Steve Davis (Charleston, SC)

“Not just an ordinary human being but indeed an Advanced Soul” — Commentator @ Chicago Sun Times

“I’ll do whatever he says to do. I’ll collect paper cups off the ground to make his pathway clear.” — Halle Berry

“A quantum leap in American consciousness” — Deepak Chopra

“He is not operating on the same plane as ordinary politicians. . . . the agent of transformation in an age of revolution, as a figure uniquely qualified to open the door to the 21st century.” – Gary Hart

“Barack Obama is our collective representation of our purest hopes, our highest visions and our deepest knowings . . . He’s our product out of the all-knowing quantum field of intelligence.” — Eve Konstantine

“This is bigger than Kennedy. . . . This is the New Testament.” | “I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often. No, seriously. It’s a dramatic event.” — Chris Matthews

“[Obama is ] creative imagination which coupled with brilliance equals wisdom . . . [He is] the man for this time.” — Toni Morrison

“Obama’s finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don’t even really inspire. They elevate. . . . He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . . . Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves.” — Ezra Klein

“Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind.” — Gerald Campbell

“We’re here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth.” — Oprah Winfrey

“I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan.” — Bill Rush

***

“But I don’t want to go among mad people,” Alice remarked.

“Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat. “We’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.”

Lewis Carroll

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals, What Liberal Media?

United States Army Chaplain Harry A. Rauch III hands a folded American flag to the granddaughter of Major Timothy D. Fulton during a memorial service for Major Fulton at Arlington National Cemetery, Dec. 16, 2008. </p> <p>(Photo and caption submitted by Mike Lynaugh)

United States Army Chaplain Harry A. Rauch III hands a folded American flag to the granddaughter of Major Timothy D. Fulton during a memorial service for Major Fulton at Arlington National Cemetery, Dec. 16, 2008. (Photo and caption submitted by Mike Lynaugh)

Filed under: The War on Terror , ,

Legally Retarded Photo of the Day

Protesters partake in "Join the Impact" outside the County Courthouse in Boulder, Colorado, on Nov. 15, 2008, as part of a national rally against California's Proposition 8. (Photo and caption submitted by Eric Anderson)

Protesters partake in "Join the Impact" outside the County Courthouse in Boulder, Colorado, on Nov. 15, 2008, as part of a national rally against California's Proposition 8. (Photo and caption submitted by Eric Anderson)

*sigh* How many times must I repeat this.

Human beings are born with rights.  We don’t “earn” them; we don’t “deserve” them.

The state acknowledges and respects them or it does not.

Redefining marriage as between women and women or between men and men is not a “right.” Should homosexuals ever be permitted by the state to redefine marriage, it will not occur because it is a “right.”

Filed under: Crazy liberals

“What Liberal Media?” Politico.com Laments Israeli Attacks Will Interfere with Obama Honeymoon

The priorities of some liberals is truly the stuff of parody.

Responding to rocket attacks launched by the savages of Hamas, Israel has conducted a massive military response. Good for Israel.

Meanwhile, in a story titled “Conflict upends Obama’s plans,” Ben Smith and Harry Siegel at Politico.com respond to the event thusly:

Israel’s continuing attacks on Gaza serve as a reminder that President-elect Barack Obama and his nominee to be secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, will not get to choose the world they inherit Jan. 20.

As opposed to all those other Presidents who did get to choose the world they inherited?

The incoming administration had planned to focus on the economic crisis and recalibrating U.S. policy in Iraq and Afghanistan in its early months — but the Israeli assault on Hamas may have instantly changed that calculus.

Uh, George W. Bush was expected to juggle the war on terror and economic concerns. You know, like after 9/11/01. Do you remember 9/11/01? Presidents are expected to devote their efforts to multiple problems, issues, or concerns.

“For all the talk of putting the [Middle East] conflict on the back burner, it’s going force itself onto the front burner,” said Daniel Levy, a fellow at the New America Foundation. Levy said that if the conflict in Gaza is still ongoing when Obama takes office, he will face regional and international pressure to broker a settlement.

When will people finally understand that the Muslims conducting these attacks DO NOT WANT a “settlement” ?

Obama’s views on the Israeli action remain opaque. Even as the attack continued into its third day Monday, with a Palestinian death toll topping 300 and Israel threatening a ground invasion, Obama had yet to say a word about the crisis, on the grounds that President George W. Bush (who has also been silent) must take the lead.

Of course, of course. Obama will take the microphone and stand before the camera when he’s making appointments to his cabinet. As for the dirty work, George W. Bush is still President!

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals, The Religion of Peace Files, The War on Terror , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bernard Madoff or U.S. Congress?

Star-Ledger: The Ponzi scheme that Baby Boomers are waiting to cash in on by Paul Mulshine

I think it is fair to say that 2008 has been the worst year in the history of the Republican Party. Every conservative columnist in America has weighed in with a theory on how to rescue the right. So here’s mine: Stop treating the young people of America the way Bernie Madoff treated his investors.

A lot of people have been comparing the Ponzi scheme allegedly run by Madoff to the Ponzi scheme run by the U.S. government, also known as Social Security.

That’s entirely unfair.

To Madoff.

From what I can gather, Madoff at least made an attempt to invest the money he got from early investors to give them the returns he promised. Those investments failed to bring in enough money and the scheme was doomed to fail sooner or later. But if Madoff had been a more brilliant investor, it might have worked.

The federal government, on the other hand, never tried to make the Social Security system work. The feds didn’t invest the money in the market. They took the money that we gave them and lent it to themselves, promising themselves interest. To be paid by themselves.

This scheme is even more crooked than Madoff’s. But try and explain that to adults, especially Baby Boomers. The math is complicated, but the typical boomer seems to understand that he or she is on the winning side of the curve in this scheme. We will get a good return on our Social Security payments and a fantastic return on our payments into Medicare.

But try talking to kids about it. I do so regularly, often in college classes that I visit.

Whenever I am before a class, I make it a point to tell the students the truth about Social Security. And the truth is that when the current crop of college kids are in their peak earning years, each will be supporting half a retiree. “I’ll be on the beach sipping a margarita and you’ll be paying my bills,” I tell the kids.

And maybe that was the point all along.

F.D.R.’s economic illiteracy will ruin us.

Filed under: Everything Else

From The Religion of Peace Files: Hamas Finds it Difficult to Take a Aerial Hint

AP: Defiant Hamas hits Israel with dozens of rockets By IBRAHIM BARZAK and JASON KEYSER

Filed under: The Religion of Peace Files, The War on Terror

The Cult of Obama: President-Elect Barack Obama “Commemorative Coins”

The cultist worship of Obama has spiraled further down the toilet into money making opportunities. It was t-shirts for a while. Now we enter the universe of currency.

“Commemorative” coins of Barack Obama are being sold by some shameless excuse for a coin company, which feature a dollar sign but are not actual currency.  Apparently the coins were official $1 currency, but the front has Obama’s face superimposed on the original. If you’re wondering how legal it is to deface currency, it’s actually not legal.

At the company website, which I will not include here, there is this statement at the bottom of the page:

The [coin manufacturer]  is not affiliated with the United States Government in any way. The United States Government does not endorse this featured product nor is the [coin manufacturer] affiliated with the United States Mint.

The coin image below is just one of several. Another coin includes Obama’s face with George Washington, and a third coin features Obama  next to the Lincoln Memorial.To place The Second Coming of Christ on currency before he has even entered the Oval Office is bizarre enough. To place him on the same level with Washington or Lincoln is obscene.

President-Elect Barack Obama "Commemorative Coins", not official United States Mint product

It has come to the attention of the United States Mint that several private commercial businesses are advertising so-called “Barack Obama Presidential $1 Coins,” as well as commemorative half-dollar coins, American Eagle Silver Coins and multi-coin sets bearing images of the President-Elect. These advertisements feature genuine United States coins that the private commercial businesses have altered by affixing a colorized image to the coin. Additionally, some businesses have treated the coins by gold-plating them.

These items are not official United States Mint products. Furthermore, these products, businesses, and advertisements are not approved, endorsed, sponsored, or authorized by the United States Mint, the Department of the Treasury, or the United States Government.

The United States Mint receives frequent inquiries from the public concerning its position on the industry practice of superimposing colorized images—such as those of prominent public figures, celebrities, or cartoon characters—on genuine United States coins. The United States Mint does not encourage, endorse, or sponsor products that alter the fundamental images depicted on its coins. Congress itself mandates by statute the design themes and inscriptions that appear on United States coins. A superimposed image is entirely different from and obscures the coin’s original design.

Apparently, even narcissists need a break.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals

For Illinois Governor, Impeachment Approacheth

Politico: Lt. Gov.: Blagojevich impeached by Feb. By LISA LERER

llinois Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn said he expects embattled Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich will be impeached by Feb. 12, when the state celebrates the 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth.

“He disgraced himself, he’s disgraced the people of Illinois and the proper thing to do is to step aside and resign,” Quinn said in a Sunday interview on CBS’s “Face The Nation.”

Quinn said that if he replaces Blagojevich as governor, he would urge that the Senate seat that had been held by President-elect Barack Obama be filled in a June special election. Until then, Quinn said he would push the state legislature to make a temporary appointment to fill the seat.

Quinn, who was nominated separately from Blagojevich in the primary, said he last spoke with the governor in August 2007.

“I tried to talk to the governor over the last year and a half, he’s a hard guy to reach,” said Quinn.

“He’s isolated. He always has been. He doesn’t really ask other people for their advice other than a very tight palace guard.”

Filed under: Crazy liberals , , ,

“What Liberal Media?” — Eric Alterman

While the story below is hearsay, but some forms of hearsay are much more credible than other forms.

What I Saw At McCain Headquarters On Election Night 2008 by Austin Hill

Later that night, when the clock struck 9pm on the West Coast, and California was “called” for Obama, and Obama was thus declared the winner of the election, several American journalists began cheering, “high-fiving” each other, and dancing about in the McCain media center. A shot of staffers jumping and hugging on the set at CNN in Atlanta appeared on our big screen monitors, as well. “Oh dear God,” Ian exclaimed in his thick Irish brogue. “You weren’t jokin about the bias.”

“Pardon me” I replied, not quite understanding his point.

“I said you weren’t jokin about bias in American media” he said. “What’s with all this celebration for one candidate over the other?”

“It’s real” I told him. “You’re seeing some American media professionals in a rare moment of candor. Usually the bias is more subtle, but it’s always present. That’s why you can’t believe all the wonderful things told to you by the American press about Obama and other liberal politicians, nor can you believe everything terrible told to you about Bush and other conservatives.”

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, Crazy liberals, What Liberal Media? , , , ,

As Bush Leaves Office, New York Times Accidentally Publishes Positive News

Apparently, George W. Bush, also known as “Satan” to the junk-bond New York Times, isn’t such a bad guy after all!

NY Times: Expansion of Clinics Shapes Bush Legacy

Although the number of uninsured and the cost of coverage have ballooned under his watch, President Bush leaves office with a health care legacy in bricks and mortar: he has doubled federal financing for community health centers, enabling the creation or expansion of 1,297 clinics in medically underserved areas.

For those in poor urban neighborhoods and isolated rural areas, including Indian reservations, the clinics are often the only dependable providers of basic services like prenatal care, childhood immunizations, asthma treatments, cancer screenings and tests for sexually transmitted diseases.

As a crucial component of the health safety net, they are lauded as a cost-effective alternative to hospital emergency rooms, where the uninsured and underinsured often seek care.

Filed under: What Liberal Media?

Priorities 101 Among Jews, the Associated Press

Regarding the recent scandal involving Wall Street adviser Bernard Madoff, who defrauded investors from $50 billion, the A.P. wrote an entire story on Jews and how frightened they are that the recent Madoff scandal might inspire people with already bigoted opinions against Jews. In the words of the A.P., it’s “particularly wrenching for Jews.”

Wow, what a great sense of priorities! Fortunately those frightened Jews and the Marxists at the Associated Press aren’t too concerned with other matters like sympathizing with, you know, the people who Madoff defrauded, many of whom were Jewish.

Associated Press: Some Jews fear Madoff case stokes anti-Semitism — Madoff scandal fits profile of `affinity fraud,’ proves particularly wrenching for Jews By Jennifer Peltz

Filed under: Crazy liberals, What Liberal Media? , , , , , ,

Massachusetts and Rhode Island Actively Seeking Foreign Workers

NumbersUSA: Which States’ Delegations Were Especially Naughty and Put a Lump of Coal in Their Workers’ Christmas Stockings? by Roy Beck

We can track them even though the chambers of Congress are empty on this Christmas Eve. We know which state congressional delegations are the aspiring Scrooges by what they left behind — a clear trail of votes and co-sponsorships making it easy for us to give out our awards for the Naughtiest Congressional Delegations (and also the NICEST!) when it comes to American workers who are unemployed — or fear they soon will be. And the winners are . . .
‘NAUGHTIEST’ DELEGATION OF THE YEAR

The neighboring states of Massachusetts and Rhode Island fought hard to be the best at ruining the holidays for their states’ workers.

Both delegations were UNANIMOUS in the Congress just ended in favoring higher importations of foreign workers and in tying up millions of U.S. jobs with illegal foreign workers.

The rest of you may think you have some real stinkers in your state’s delegation to Congress, but imagine what it must be like to not have even one Member of Congress standing up for the state’s workers against the desires of unscrupulous employers seeking their cheap foreign labor.

Because Rhode Island has only 4 Members in its delegation, I have to give the top Scrooge award to Massachusetts which is able to keep its perfect anti-American-worker record even though it has 12 Members in its delegation to keep in line.

Such discipline! Such a sense of community! Not one elected Member of Congress from Massachusetts dares break with the rest by speaking up for the interests of the rising tide of unemployed Americans.

No, every one of these dozen Bay Staters earns a Grade of D or lower for nearly always favoring foreign workers (and their employers) over American workers. They cheer current policies that bring in 140,000 NEW foreign workers each month, even as a half-million American workers have been losing jobs monthly. In fact, this dozen has constantly worked to bring in MORE than 140,000 a month.

Look at the page with their grades. It is ablaze with the scarlet letters of D and F for their lack of Christmas compassion for the least fortunate among the citizens they were elected to represent.

It will take visits by a lot more than three ghosts to transform these Scrooges — it is going to take thousands of citizens who every day remind these congressional Members and their staff what they are doing with their immigration actions.

(Those of you in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, be sure you have gone to your Action Buffet and sent proper greetings to your congressional Scrooges.)

HARD-HEARTED DELEGATIONS, BUT NOT QUITE THE TOP SCROOGE

The national unemployment stats are really bad. But in the states where joblessness is much worse, seven have BOTH of their U.S. Senators working diligently to bring in more foreign workers to compete for the dwindling number of jobs.

* California
* Connecticut
* Florida
* Illinois
* Ohio
* Rhode Island
* Washington

No need to worry about the enemy outside of our borders when we already have one much worse within them.

Filed under: Crazy liberals

Good Riddance

One less leftist to pollute the Earth.

AP: Nobel-winning playwright Harold Pinter dies at 78 By PAISLEY DODDS

Filed under: Crazy liberals , , , , , , , , ,

10 Richest People of All Time and How They Made Their Fortunes

Filed under: Everything Else

The Ponzi Scheme That is Social “Security”

Nine Most Brazen Ponzi Schemes in History

9. Social Security

Well, not exactly, but Social Security does have a few similarities to a Ponzi scheme.

But first, a little about Social Security. In 1935, President Roosevelt introduced a controversial “social insurance” to prevent the crushing poverty that hit many Americans in their old age during the Great Depression. As part of his New Deal, Social Security provided benefits to retirees and the unemployed, financed by taxes on current worker’s wages.

The details have changed over the years, but the basics remain the same: just like in a Ponzi scheme, money from new investors (taxpayer) is used as payout to older investors (retirees).

From 1937 to 2005, Social Security has taken in more than $10.7 trillion in taxes and other income. In the same time period, it has given out more than $8.9 trillion (Source). The program is actually taking in more in taxes than it gives out in benefits (and invested it in Treasurys – this in itself is a complicated issue because it’s akin to the government giving itself an IOU). It is projected to run a surplus until 2018, when the baby boomers are expected to retire and start draw their benefits. Though it’s difficult to accurately predict, Social Security’s own trustees expect the program to run out of money by 2040 unless big changes are made (Source).

There’s one similarity between Social Security and Ponzi scheme that is irrefutable: the early investors/retirees get the better end of the deal. The first person to receive monthly retirement check was Ida May Fuller of Ludlow, Virginia. Ida retired in November 1939 at the age of 65 and started collecting her checks in January 1940. She lived to be 100 years old, and during her lifetime, she collected $22,888.92 in Social Security benefits. Ida put in a total of $24.75 into the system, thus giving a return of over 90,000%!

Filed under: Everything Else

The U.S. Constitution for Libs

Via the awesome Mark Levin, back in the 1930s, H.L. Mencken “re-wrote” the U.S. Constitution. Below is the Mencken’s “Preamble”:

PREAMBLE:

We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish social justice, draw the fangs of privilege, effect the redistribution of property, remove the burden of liberty from ourselves and our posterity, and insure the continuance of the New Deal, do ordain and establish this Constitution.

Sound familiar? Under an Obama administration, it will be.

The rest can be found here.

Filed under: Crazy liberals

Isn’t It Ironic? Obama Not Too Friendly Toward Media

Weekly Standard: Guess Who Doesn’t Like the Press And the feeling may be mutual by Stephen F. Hayes

[A]fter riding a wave of media adulation unseen in recent times, [Obama] now less than a month from becoming our 44th president. And he still doesn’t like the press.

Filed under: Isn't It Ironic?

Our Stalinist Media and Caroline Kennedy’s (Lack of) Political Experience

IBD: Caroline Palin By INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY

As the Kennedy du jour tours New York seeking Hillary’s seat, will she be asked tough questions by Couric, Gibson, et al.?

Kennedy’s interest in New York politics has been minimal. As the Daily News has reported, she skipped about half the 38 contested elections held since she registered to vote in New York in 1988, including four Democratic primaries in mayoral elections won three times by Republicans.

She also missed voting in the race for the Senate seat she now seeks. Seems she was doing something else in 1994, when Daniel Patrick Moynihan was running for re-election.

The New York Times described her qualifications thus: “Ms. Kennedy has much going for her. As a public figure, she carries the glamour and poignancy of her family.” Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post gushes that our “tragic national princess,” the “Cinderella Kennedy” is “finally rewarded” for “her years of quiet dignity.” First a pony, now a Senate seat.

Contrast such swooning over Caroline with the full-court press the media put on Sarah Palin. The Alaska governor’s experience, interest in her state and political involvement make Caroline look like a Chihuahua next to Palin’s pit bull, with or without lipstick. We doubt if Katie Couric will ask Camelot’s heiress how much she spends on her wardrobe. [Or what newspapers she reads -- Ed.]

As we have noted, Caroline’s chief accomplishments seem to have been organizing a rock concert in Central Park to raise private money for New York City public schools, serving on the board of a ballet company and heading up Barack Obama’s vice presidential selection committee, a panel that labored mightily and produced a Joe Biden.

Palin, by contrast, is a former small-town mayor and the governor of a major energy-rich state. She can hunt, kill and cook. Not many working moms can handle an automatic rifle, run a state and bake cookies too.

She runs a government of 24,000 employees, oversees 14 statewide Cabinet agencies and manages a $10 billion budget. She set in motion a $40 billion pipeline to bring Alaskan natural gas to the lower 48 states. And she squeezed the oil companies to give every Alaskan a $1,200 share in her state’s energy wealth.

Sarah not only voted in Alaskan elections, but also won a few, starting with her home town of Wasilla. She defeated a sitting Republican governor in the primary and a two-term former Democratic governor in the general election. No one had to appoint her.

No wonder people are cynical about politics. Merit counts less than one’s bloodline. What’s in a name? Everything, it seems .

Filed under: What Liberal Media? , , , , , ,

The Impotent Republican Party of Minnesota

For the bizarre looking Al Franken, who thought himself fitting to run for a Senate seat in Minnesota, it’s not too difficult to steal the election against Norm Coleman. Franken is running against a Republican party that is as impotent as a geriatric who lost his month’s supply of Viagara.

For those delusional Minnesotans who voted for this degenerate, the joke shall be on them.

al_franken_looking_drunk

“It’s bad enough that the Republican Party can’t prevent Democrats from voting in its primaries and saddling us with The New York Times’ favorite Republican as our presidential nominee. If the Republican Party can’t protect an election won by the incumbent U.S. senator in Minnesota, there is no point in donating to the Republican Party.”

Ann Coulter

Filed under: Crazy liberals, Everything Else

Liberal Media Continues to Joke About Attack on Bush

bush-attack1

Imagine if some malcontent threw his shoes at Barack Obama.

The New York Times would surely be in a state of rage, demanding to know why the Secret Service failed protect Obama. It would direct personal attacks at the man who throw his shoes at Obama. In short, the media would display a self-righteous fury not seen Governor Sarah Palin mocked the intentionally nebulous concept of “community organizer.”

If that President attacked was Barack Obama, The New York Times would never publish stories noting the style of the shoe, or that there has been an increased demand for the shoe. We’d never be informed of name of the shoe, Ducati Model 271. Nor would we be told about those irony-deaf shoe companies which, while increasing production of the shoe due to increased demand, would be printing “five thousand posters advertising the shoes, on their way to the Middle East and Turkey, proclaim ‘Goodbye Bush, Welcome Democracy’ in Turkish, English and Arabic.” The entire culture would be derided as having some bizarre foot or shoe fetish.

But the President attacked was not Obama; the President was a Republican. All abuse of George W. Bush has been welcome, celebrated, defended as “patriotic.” Since 2000, it has been the only standard for the Stalinists who control the American media.

NY Times: ‘Bush Shoe’ Gives Firm a Footing in the Market By SEBNEM ARSU

Filed under: What Liberal Media? , , , , , ,

P.C. in the U.K.: English Liberals Remove Crucifix in Prison Prayer Room

Daily Mail: Prison bans chapel crucifix to avoid offending Muslims By Daily Mail Reporter

A prison’s new chapel will not contain a crucifix to avoid offending Muslim inmates, it emerged today.

Bosses at HMP Lewes have been told the traditional Christian symbol, featuring Jesus nailed to a cross, must not be used in the Grade-II listed Victorian jail’s ‘multi-faith space’.

The room — part of a £1million new block — has been split in two, with one half featuring heated foot baths so Muslim worshippers can wash their feet before prayer.

But the other side, dedicated to Christian prayer, contains just a simple wooden cross and portable alter – both of which can be removed if necessary.

Try to follow the logic, if it doesn’t give you a migraine in the process: Expensive (and highly unreasonable)  accommodations for Muslims (but not Christians) are perfectly fine, but displaying a symbol of Christianity on the wall? Oh hell no!

At no point do these idiots ever consider the possibility that the systematic suppression of Christianity might offend, you know, Christians. But I need not tell you where sympathies lie among liberals.

According the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB), the traditional Christian crucifix was erased from the chapel’s blueprints after discussion with a Muslim imam.

If naivete was mass, whoever is making these decisions would create several black holes. Consider: they consulted with a Muslim imam about a Christian symbol. First of all, if they knew anything about Islam, they wouldn’t have to consult with the imam considering that Islam professes total contempt for anything non-Muslim. OF COURSE, the imam was going to object.

The greater question is whether anyone has the right to demand one religion and its symbols be suppressed.  Muslims are not being packed on train cars and forced to attend Midnight Mass. As far as I understand, Muslims in England are free to practice their religion without interference.

Do you think anyone in Iran or Saudi Arabia would give a rat’s ass what a Catholic thought or felt?

Amanda Hamblin, chairman of the IMB, said: ‘We see this as a vastly improved facility and very much welcome the fact that the prison has an imam.

‘It is key that everyone will have access to a decent place of worship whether they are Muslims, Christians or any other faith.

So an imam is employed by the prison, but hanging a crucifix or a cross in the prison prayer room is a problem.

Does hanging a crucifix or cross on the wall of a prison render the place indecent?

‘[T]he facilities were very poor before. Now they have been set up with a lot of consultation and thought given to how to make it fit for purpose, fit for access and fit for the religious needs of our prisoners, whatever those may be.’

A crucifix or cross did not hamper “access” or “the religious needs” of your prisoners, unless one of those needs was the suppression of one religion in favor of another.

A source at Lewes Prison, which houses 668 convicts, said he was not surprised by the decision to ‘drop Jesus’ from show.

He added: ‘This is typical. On one side of the room there are heated foot baths for the Muslim inmates, but on the other side there is this silly little movable alter that can be hidden away at a moment’s notice.

‘And there is just a wooden cross, not a crucifix showing the suffering Jesus went through, because those in power thought it might offend the Muslims.’

He continued: ‘I don’t think the Muslim prisoners would give a monkeys to be honest, it’s just the normal PC brigade poking its nose in when it isn’t needed.’

If this man is correct, Muslims may not be bothered at all by crosses and crucifixes. No matter. The mindless liberals running the show will assume offense and then act on that assumption.

This is the latest in a very long line of examples of “anarchy in the U.K.” The misguided people controlling England and institutions continue to take a bulldozer to its long history, its language, religion, culture, traditions, etc.

Nothing is safe.

Is anyone fighting this open contempt and systematic censorship? Do the English understand that they are quickly committing cultural suicide all in some foolish and delusional effort to spare the feelings — FEELINGS — of those who have immigrated into their land? (1) Do they even suspect the harm they are causing?

Entire generations made England a global super power. Now it can barely control its own borders while it is openly embarrassed of anything remotely related to its heritage. No need to worry about the enemy without when the enemy within is infinitely worse. You know, kind of like the United States.

For those Muslims and English liberals who sincerely believe that a cross is offensive,

here are 14:

christianbrushes-crosses1

For those Muslims and English liberals who agree that a crucifix is offensive, here’s a big one:

crucifix1

__________________
(1) I don’t mean to imply that human emotions are not of great value; they are. I can be quite emotional about all sorts of matters. But when emotions cloud or eliminate any rational thought, they then lose any value they have. Too many people making serious decisions on matters of public policy live their lives ignoring any need for logic and rationality. They are usually known as liberals. It would be bad enough if they acted in this manner in their personal lives, but their actions impact millions of innocent people. So when a prayer room his constructed for prisoners, it is fair to make reasonable accommodations for all faiths. Requesting a copy of a Quran, for example, would be reasonable. Installing foot baths with warm water is far from reasonable. It’s bloody asinine and unnecessary. (Imagine Christians getting away with such an outlandish request. What’s with Muslims and their bizarre foot/shoe fetish?) Speaking of shoes, my message to Iraqis: stop throwing your shoes at my President or waving them in protest, you ingrate weirdos. President Bush merely put his entire career and life on the line to do the job that your people failed repeatedly to do: eliminate the ruthless and sadistic dictator who created your nation into a prison. If you don’t have the civility to express a modicum of appreciation to this man, then kindly shut the fuck up.

Filed under: Crazy liberals, The Religion of Peace Files , , , , , , , , , ,

Student Accuses Rhode Island College Faculty of Abuses of Power

If you scratch the surface of a liberal, you will often find a mini-totalitarian.

Fox News: Student Says School Persecuted Him for Being Conservative

A former student at the Rhode Island College School of Social Work is suing the school and several of his professors for discrimination, saying he was persecuted by the school’s “liberal political machine” for being a conservative.

William Felkner, 45, says the New England college and six professors wouldn’t approve his final project on welfare reform because he was on the “wrong” side of political issues and countered the school’s “progressive” liberal agenda.

Felkner said his problems with his professors began in his first semester, in the fall of 2004, when he objected in an e-mail to one of his professors that the school was showing and promoting Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 9/11″ on campus. He said he objected because no opposing point of view was presented.

He said Professor James Ryczek wrote to him on Oct. 15, 2004, saying he was proud of his bias and questioning Felkner’s ability to “fit with the profession.”

“I think the biases and predilections I hold toward how I see the world and how it should be are why I am a social worker. In the words of a colleague, I revel in my biases,” he wrote.

Felkner’s complaint, filed two years ago, alleges that Ryczek discriminated against him for his conservative viewpoint and gave him bad grades because of it in several classes. It also alleges discrimination by other professors and administrators.

Felkner said he received failing grades in Ryczek’s class for holding viewpoints opposed to the progressive direction of the class.

Felkner says he was also discriminated against by Professor Roberta Pearlmutter, who he says refused to allow him to participate in a group project lobbying for a conservative issue because the assignment was to lobby for a liberal issue. He alleges that Perlmutter spent a 50-minute class “assailing” his views and allowed students to openly ridicule his conservative positions, and that she reduced his grade because he was not “progressive.”

The Rhode Island College School of Social Work did not respond to a request for comment[Shocking! -- Ed.]

Felkner, a self-proclaimed free-market conservative, told FOXNews.com that during his final year, he wanted to do a project on “work first” welfare, which requires that recipients get jobs before they can get benefits. He said the school advocated an “education first” system, in which recipients get job training and don’t have to work for benefits.

“Basically it was a system that resulted in 2 percent of [Rhode Island's] recipients being on welfare for over 10 years. It was just not working,” Felkner said. While at the college he had an internship with the governor’s office on public policy to work on welfare reform.

The social work organizing and policy degree program requires a student to complete a project that works for “progressive social change.” He was scheduled to complete his project in January, but he said the defendants’ actions kept him from finishing and graduating.

“There were two years worth of discrimination really, there’s no better way to put it, because I had different views than the school does,” Felkner said. “It’s kind of insane to think that someone studying how to help the poor can’t research welfare reform.” [It's not "kind of" insane. It IS insane. -- Ed.]

Felkner also alleges in his complaint that the school’s treatment of him restricted his ability to express his opinions and that his bad grades damaged his professional reputation and would make it difficult for him to get a job as a social worker. [Well, that was the intent. -- Ed.]

Kim Strom-Gottfried, professor of social work at U.N.C. Chapel Hill, said that faculty members should not impose their politics on students.

“My bottom line is I think clearly as faculty we have to appraise our students based on required competencies and demonstrations of that, whether critical thinking or whatever, but there shouldn’t be a belief litmus test for joining the profession or for an assignment,” Strom-Gottfried said.

“The questions I have in cases such as his — why would someone choose to affiliate with a profession that’s so at odds with his beliefs and his value-base? That’s always a question for me,” she said.

Bruce Thyer, professor of social work and former dean at the College of Social Work at Florida State University, has written about discrimination against conservatives and against evangelical Christians in social work. He said discrimination hurts the profession.

“I have seen students actively discouraged from perusing social work because of their politically conservative views. I’ve also seen it happen with students who have held strong religious views,” he said. “I think that the profession is a great and noble discipline and there are occasional episodes like this that cast a black eye, and it’s really unnecessary.”

Thyer said liberal and conservative social workers have the same goal — to help people — and that the school overstepped its bounds in Felkner’s case.

“I think it’s an overzealous faculty wishing to impose their own political views upon those of their students, and that’s unfortunate because there are many areas in which liberal and conservative thinkers within the discipline of social work have so much to agree upon,” he said. “Nobody’s advocating, certainly not Bill Felkner, that people not be helped.”

The college filed a motion for summary judgment this summer, but it was recently denied by the court. Felkner said the school is now seeking a settlement.

Filed under: Education or Lack Thereof , , ,

California Attorney General Dislikes the Will of the People, Seeks Overturn of Gay Marriage Ban

On the matter of voting and the will of the people, the reasoning of liberals maybe be condensed thusly:

If the people vote in a way approved by liberals, then the democratic process works great and it’s time to celebrate.

If the people vote in a way not approved by liberals, however, then the process is not only broken, it is unconstitutional, racist, sexist, bigoted, homophobic, and we must bastardize the courts ASAP to do our their while the more stupid among them protest in the streets carrying cardboard signs with incomplete, illogical, silly, or inaccurate slogans, some of which might have been composed by grade school children.

And so when the people of California clearly rejected the redefinition of marriage and approved Proposition 8 in November, the Pink Mafia took to the streets, scapegoated Mormons and anyone who dared voted in favor of Prop 8. Isn’t it ironic?

Fox: California Attorney General Asks State Supreme Court to Void Gay Marriage Ban — California Attorney General Jerry Brown changed course on the state’s new same-sex marriage ban Friday and urged the state Supreme Court to void Proposition 8.

Filed under: Crazy liberals , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

What Liberal Media: If Caroline’s Last Name Was Palin

Fox: If Caroline’s Last Name Was Palin By Andrea Tantaros

What has she done in her career? Does she have the experience to govern? Isn’t she just a name and a pretty face in expensive clothes? All questions asked by Democrats (I’m being nice) regarding Sarah Palin as McCain’s pick for Vice President.

But Caroline Kennedy -– similarly an intriguing, attractive outsider decked in designer duds and a thin resume — isn’t put under the same kind of scrutiny. Apparently, qualifications don’t matter to the left as long as you don’t hunt moose.

The left is just plain giddy with excitement over a return to Camelot and the New York press corps, the most selectively tough in the business, is following suit. One this is certain: if Kennedy’s last name were Palin she wouldn’t be anointed.

I would add that Palin also had to deal with regional bigotry.

I guess if you go to certain schools, come from a certain state, and have a certain last name, you’re not subject to scrutiny.

Filed under: John McCain/Sarah Palin, What Liberal Media? , , , , ,

Isn’t It Ironic? Hippie Parents of “American Taliban” Beg Bush for Pardon

john-walker-lindh

Recall John Walker Lindh, the young man caught by the U.S. military and currently serving a short prison sentence (20 years) for his support of the Taliban. Lindh left California (where else?) to study Islam and somehow ended up being the useful idiot that he is. Lindh plead guilty to aiding terrorists.

Lindh’s parents, who strike me as the kind of people who would have protested the Vietnam War in the 1960s and cursed President BusHitler’s name since 2000, are appealing to that same President to commute Lindh’s sentence. Isn’t it ironic?

At a news conference, Lindh’s mother, Mary Walker, atleast attempted a rational argument for commuting the sentence of her son:

“John thought he was going to Afghanistan to defend civilians against attacks by warlords who were being supported by Russia and Iran. Although this was a mistake on John’s part, it is not something that warrants his continued imprisonment…”

“A mistake on John’s part”? “A mistake”? Thinking that John McCain respects conservatives is “a mistake.” But Lindh?

Oh, on the other hand, who are we to judge? Who among us has not (1) left their home and family, (2) traveled half-way across the world, (3) converted to Islam, and (4) joined a group of fundamentalist and anti-American terrorists (5) in armed battle?

As for Frank Lindh, the father of the traitor, he couldn’t be bothered to outline, you know, legal reasons why Lindh should be released. The good liberal he is, Frank Lindh appealed to the warmonger Bush’s emotions while exhibiting some good ass kissery for good measure. Quoth Lindh, Sr.:

“None of us has ever given up hope that President Bush would show it in his heart to release John from prison. Back at the time when John was picked up, President Bush was the only public official in the US who spoke in a sympathetic way about John. There was something about John’s situation . . . that really did touch the President. There’s been an awful lot on the President’s plate since 2002. This is the time when the President will revisit those original feelings that he had, and find it in his heart to release John from prison . . .”

Where were these two opportunists when Bush needed support for, say, the invasion of Iraq, or the War on Terror generally? Or support for anything else?

I understand the desire of any parent to have his child out of prison. I suspect, however, that in their conversion-by-convenience, these oblivious parents still do not comprehend the gravity of what their son did.

John Lindh’s behavior revealed a grave lack of judgment at best. I wish no ill will on him nor on his family, but commuting his sentence reduces treason to a common crime. I remind the Lindh family, and John himself, that treason was once punished by execution. In many parts of the world, it still is. Perhaps the Lindh family would do well to be grateful and cease reminding patriotic Americans of their existence.

Update: In Michelle Malkin’s December 19th column, she recounts bits and pieces of the real John Lindh, who is not the angel his parents would like us to believe:

[Lindh] told the feds he trained with al Qaeda before the September 11 attacks and he fought alongside them after Osama bin Laden’s henchmen murdered 3,000 of Lindh’s fellow citizens on American soil. He wrote a letter to his mother expressing support for the U.S.S. Cole bombing that took 17 sailors’ lives and, despite an emphatic denial by Lindh’s father that Jihad Johnny took up arms against his country, he recounted how his rifle malfunctioned on the front lines in Takar.

Finally, on Nov. 25, 2001, upon being captured and taken to the Qala I Jangi fortress outside Mazar E Shiref for interrogation, Suleyman al-Faris/Abdul Hamid/John Walker Lindh sat silent — and deliberately and defiantly chose not to tell American CIA officer and former Marine Corps artillery specialist Mike Spann about a planned Taliban prison revolt. Spann was killed in the riot.

Asked by journalist Robert Pelton at the prison if “this the right cause or the right place,” Lindh replied unequivocally: “It is exactly what I thought it would be.”

Would you pardon this ruthless bastard? Hopefully President Bush will focus his energies on pardoning those who fight for America and not against America: Agents Compean and Ramos.

Filed under: Crazy liberals, Isn't It Ironic?, The War on Terror , , , , , , , , , , ,

This Time, the Merry Fitzmas Comes for Liberals

“Then said Jesus unto him, ‘Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.’” — Matthew 26:52.

NRO: Could the Blago Scandal Ensnare Team Obama? You Betcha. If you don’t think it can, you don’t know prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. By Byron York

[U.S. Attorney Patrick] Fitzgerald and his team have a lot of wiretap material. That has likely given them a lot of information to ask witnesses about. Some of those witnesses may be members of the Obama transition team. For example, the Chicago Tribune recently reported that “communications between [incoming White House chief of staff Rahm] Emanuel and the Blagojevich administration were captured on court-approved wiretaps.” Emanuel might be asked many questions, under penalty of perjury or false-statement charges. Prosecutors will compare his answers to what they have on tape. Perhaps they’ll invite him in for another session of questioning. Then they’ll compare his answers in the second session to his answers in the first. Perhaps they’ll repeat that a few times. As anyone in the Bush administration could advise Emanuel, it doesn’t matter if he did anything wrong or not. He just better have his answers in order.

There’s no way to say now what will happen. In the meantime, Barack Obama is saying nothing. The president-elect says his transition team has completed its internal investigation into Blagojevich contacts and has found that “there was nothing that my office did that was in any way inappropriate or related to the charges that have been brought.” But Obama says Fitzgerald has asked him to postpone releasing the investigation’s results until December 22. Fitzgerald’s office later issued a one-sentence statement confirming the request, so that it can “conduct certain interviews.”

Until then, don’t ask Obama anything even related to the matter. “Let me just cut you off, because I don’t want you to waste your question,” Obama told Tribune reporter John McCormick Tuesday, after McCormick attempted to ask whether Emanuel’s reportedly extensive communications with the Blagojevich administration on the Senate-seat question contradicted Obama’s earlier claims to be taking a hands-off approach to the issue. “I don’t want to get into the details at this point,” Obama answered.

McCormick got the message. As Obama, standing by education-secretary-designate and basketball buddy Arne Duncan, continued to avoid answering the question, McCormick moved on to a more acceptable topic. “Do you or Duncan have a better jump shot?” he asked.

Obama smiled. At least for now. But he knows, or should know, that Fitzgerald and his prosecutors won’t be nearly as accommodating as the press.

Change and hope, ladies and gentlemen.

Filed under: Crazy liberals , , , , ,

This is Real Oppression, Libs

For a time, Vladimir Putin was murdering his critics. Now he just wants to silence them before they talk. More efficient I guess.

Once KGB, always KGB.

AP: Russian treason bill could hit Kremlin critics

New legislation backed by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin would allow Russian authorities to label any government critic a traitor—a move that rights activists said Wednesday was a chilling throwback to times of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. The bill, which is expected to become law, would expanded the definition of treason to include damaging Russia’s constitutional order, sovereignty or territorial integrity. That, rights activists said, would essentially let authorities interpret any act against state as treason—a crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

Activists said that would catapult Russia’s justice system back to the times of Stalin’s purges, calling it “legislation in the spirit of Stalin and Hitler.”

“It returns the Russian justice to the times of 1920-1950s,” the activists, which included Moscow Helsinki Group head Lyudmila Alexeyeva and Civic Assistance director Svetlana Gannushkina, said in a joint statement.

Existing law defines state treason as actions harming external security by passing information to “foreign organizations.”

Putin’s bill would add non-governmental organizations based anywhere in the world that have an office in Russia to the list of banned recipients of state secrets. The government has repeatedly accused foreign spy agencies of using NGOs as a cover to foment dissent.

But critics warned the loose wording will give authorities ample leeway to prosecute those who cooperate with international rights groups.

Filed under: Everything Else , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Time’s Disgraceful Coverage of Obama Continues

A few years ago, under the politicized leadership of some fool named Richard Stengel (1), Time morphed from a reputable news magazine into the Official Newsletter of Barack Obama (O.N.B.O.).

Over the last 12 months, Time’s transformation of its cover into Obama’s personal ad space borders on the frightening. This is the sort of thing liberals criticized totalitarians for doing. You know, when libs were not behaving like totalitarians themselves. As compiled in several other glorious posts of mine:

Since November 19, 2007 to November 24, 2008, Time’s cover featured the following politicians:

Barack Obama, the predominant/shared image: 13 times.

Barack Obama, smaller photo: 6 times.

John McCain, predominant image: 3.

Sarah Palin, predominant image: 1.

Joe Biden: zero.

It’s understandably bizarre and scary when the Chinese Communists plaster Mao’s face all over creation, but the people at Time, who merely control one newsmagazine, see it fitting to throw all journalistic standards aside, flip conservative America a big “fuck you,” plaster Obama’s face all over creation.  The situation was so blatant that Reuters wrote an entire article on the topic back in August.

So knowing all this, when Time announced it’s self-important award of “Person of the Year” for 2008, you can hardly imagine who they selected! (Note that the title was “Man of the Year” for decades. In 1986, Corazon Aquino was declared “Woman of the Year.” Ever since, Time has renamed it “Person of the Year” lest the concept of sex enter your mind. Eventually, the title will change again to “Singular Homo Sapiens of the Annual Four Seasons.”)

In selecting Barack Obama as their Socialist “Person of the Year” the objective “journalists” at Time wrote:

In one of the craziest elections in American history, he overcame a lack of experience, a funny name, two candidates who are political institutions and the racial divide to become the 44th President of the United States.

First of all, the election was hardly “crazy.”  Strange at times, but not nearly as crazy as the media’s irrational adoration of Obama and mission to destroy Sarah Palin at any cost.

Secondly, notice that with Obama safely elected, Time suddenly realizes that Obama had a “lack of experience.” You don’t say?

And with Obama safely elected, Time also awakens to the mystery that Obama has “a funny name.”  Conservatives were crucified (by Michelle Obama, among others) for simply mentioning Barack’s middle Hussein name, but Time finds it appropriate to insult Obama’s entire name.

I’ve noted in other posts here that the mainstream newsmedia in America is hemorrhaging money, to say nothing of the trust it has from the public.  While the violinists playing on the sinking Titanic did so out of bravery and not obliviousness, the journalists and reporters who form our newsmedia arrogantly fiddle, pretending that all is well, while the ship plummets.

___________________

(1). And I do mean “fool.”

The April 21st issue of Time was entitled How to Win the War on Global Warming, and depicted the Marines raising a Sequoia tree, instead of the American flag. Donald Mates, an Iwo Jima veteran, told the Business & Media Institute on April 17 that using that photograph for that cause was a “disgrace.” Stengel supported the use of the image and exposed his point of view on journalism. “I think since I’ve been back at the magazine, I have felt that one of the things that’s needed in journalism is that you have to have a point of view about things,” Stengel said. “You can’t always just say ‘on the one hand, on the other’ and you decide. People trust us to make decisions. We’re experts in what we do. So I thought, you know what, if we really feel strongly about something let’s just say so.”

Translation? “Journalism should include the personal opinions of journalists. One can’t always be objective. People depend on us to do their thinking for them because we’re so intelligent and superior. So if we have an opinion about something, we should foist it on the public disregarding the entire purpose of true journalism.”

Richard Stengel should not be trusted to run a grade school newsletter.

Filed under: Barack Obama / The Messiah, What Liberal Media? , , , , , , ,

"The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them..." -- Thomas Jefferson
"I predict the future happiness of Americans if they can prevent the government wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. " -- Thomas Jefferson
“Journalists are like dogs. When ever anything moves, they begin to bark.” -- Arthur Schopenhauer
"To say that 'wealth in America is so unfairly distributed in America' . . . is grossly misleading when most wealth in the United States is not distributed at all. People create it, earn it, save it, and spend it." -- Thomas Sowell
"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell
"The moment you give up your principles, and your values, you are dead, your culture is dead, your civilization is dead. Period." -- Oriana Fallaci
"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul." – George Bernard Shaw
"There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him." – Robert Heinlein
"A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away." – Barry Goldwater
"America’s abundance was not created by public sacrifices to the common good, but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes." -- Ayn Rand
"The free market punishes irresponsibility. Government rewards it." – Harry Browne
"No one can read our Constitution without concluding that the people who wrote it wanted their government severely limited; the words “no” and “not” employed in restraint of government power occur 24 times in the first seven articles of the Constitution and 22 more times in the Bill of Rights." – Edmund A. Opitz
"It is sobering to reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence." – Charles A. Beard
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." -- John 8:32
"Criticizing these reporters is like booing at the Special Olympics." -- Triumph the Insult Comic Dog

 

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031