The Independent: Dominic Lawson: Democrat fingerprints are all over the financial crisis — The least well off are going to face the most stringent terms for mortgages
What is the proximate cause of the collapse of confidence in the world’s banks? Millions of improvident loans to American housebuyers. Which organisations were on their own responsible for guaranteeing half of this $12 trillion market? Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the so-called Government Sponsored Enterprises which last month were formally nationalised to prevent their immediate and catastrophic collapse. Now, who do you think were among the leading figures blocking all the earlier attempts by President Bush –- and other Republicans — to bring these lending behemoths under greater regulatory control? Step forward, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.
President Bush sought to reform things and with good reason.
In September 2003 the Bush administration launched a measure to bring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under stricter regulatory control, after a report by outside investigators established that they were not adequately hedging against risks and that Fannie Mae in particular had scandalously mis-stated its accounts. In 2006, it was revealed that Fannie Mae had overstated its earnings –- to which its senior executives’ bonuses were linked -– by a stunning $9.3billion. Between 1998 and 2003, Fannie Mae’s executive chairman, Franklin Raines, picked up over $90m in bonuses and stock options.
But Bush was blocked by Barney and Maxine:
Yet [Democrat] Barney Frank and his chums blocked all Bush’s attempts to put a rein on Raines. During the House Financial Services Committee hearing following Bush’s initiative, Frank declared: “The more people exaggerate a threat of safety and soundness [at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae], the more people conjure up the possibility of serious financial losses to the Treasury which I do not see. I think we see entities that are fundamentally sound financially.” His colleague on the committee, the California Democrat Maxine Walters [sic], said: “There were nearly a dozen hearings where we were trying to fix something that wasn’t broke. Mr Chairman, we do not have a crisis at Freddie Mac and particularly at Fannie Mae under the outstanding leadership of Mr Franklin Raines.”
Frank and Waters were not the only people claiming everything was peachy:
When Mr Raines himself was challenged by the Republican Christopher Shays, to the effect that his ratio of capital to assets (that is, mortgages) of 3 per cent was dangerously low, the Fannie Mae boss retorted that “our assets are so riskless, we could have a capital ratio of under 2 per cent”.
Carter might have signed legislation behind all this, but Clinton (and Reno) gave it force:
Last week [Bill Clinton] acknowledged that “responsibility” for the absence of proper regulation rested “with Democrats who were resisting any efforts of Republicans in Congress, and earlier when I was President and tried to impose tighter standards on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac”. Then, as now, members of his own party saw all such initiatives as unwonted attacks on the chances for low-earners, and particularly African-Americans, to own their own homes.
From its inception in 1938 Fannie Mae (and later Freddie Mac) was designed to make housing finance available to “ordinary Americans”. This was a noble aim. In the 1970s another Democrat President, Jimmy Carter, introduced legislation which demanded that such bodies enhance their lending to minorities. Again, this was based on a noble idea: to stamp out racism in the mortgage market. Thus by 1998 you had the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston producing a document entitled “Closing the Gap: a Guide to Equal Opportunities Lending”, which instructed banks that an applicant’s “lack of credit history should not be seen as a negative factor” in obtaining a mortgage.
One responsible journalist, a nearly extinct species, tried to warn everyone:
Jeff Jacoby, of the Boston Globe [...] reminded his readers what he had written in 1995: “Our banks are knowingly approving risky loans to get the feds and the activists off their backs… When the coming wave of foreclosures rolls through the inner city, which of today’s self-congratulating bankers, politicians and regulators plans to take the credit?”. Jacoby adds now: “Barney Frank doesn’t. But his fingerprints are all over this fiasco.”
Some members of Congress were profiting too well from the whole mess:
[T]he biggest recipient of campaign contributions from the munificent duo of Fannie and Freddie over the past 20 years was one Christopher Dodd, Democrat Chairman of the Senate’s Banking Committee.
[G]iven that he has only been in the Senate for four of those years, the second biggest beneficiary was Barack Obama. In August, the Washington Post reported that Obama’s presidential campaign team had sought the advice of Franklin Raines “on mortgage and housing policy matters”.
Who will pick up the bill for all these good intentions?
The saddest outcome of all this within America – apart from the crippling cost to the nation’s taxpayers — is that the very people the Democrats had intended to help will be the biggest victims: for many years to come banks will demand the most stringent terms for mortgages to the least well off.
That’s right. You and me.
What is the root cause of the current mortgage lending crisis?
[Emphasis added]
Filed under: The Government Engineered Mortgage Crisis
