When you really need the assistance of others to further a particular goal, does it make sense to first INSULT those people and unfairly cast blame on them?
Of course not. This would be a stupid thing to do unless you’re the belligerent and bellicose Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House and general do-nothing. Today, Speaker Pelosi thought that a rambling, partisan, uninformed speech made prior to a huge vote would be A-OK.
Boston Herald: Boehner: Pelosi speech ‘poisoned’ GOP support
Meanwhile, let’s not forget a huge enabler of this whole mess who deserves alot more attention: bleeding heart Barney Frank (D-gay prostitution ring) whose economic illiteracy and blindness to multiculturalism is bleeding us all.
Boston Herald: Better not bank on Barney Frank — He brought the (fiscal) house down By Michael Graham
Barney [Frank] and friends used the regulations of the Community Reinvestment Act to threaten lenders into making these loans. And banks, trying to meet Frank’s demands, expanded riskier lending schemes like subprime mortgages.
[...]
Lenders asked themselves, why should I care how shaky these borrowers are or risky the loans if a government-backed body is going to buy them up anyway?
The loans were made, the housing market bubbled, contributions from F&F flowed to Democrats like Chris Dodd and Barack Obama, and everyone was happy. Until they weren’t.
Without Freddie and Fannie’s reckless expansion, the housing bubble doesn’t happen. Without the implied promise behind F&F’s money, investment banks don’t dive into the derivatives market.
Instead, we did it Barney’s way.
Boston Globe: Frank’s fingerprints are all over the financial fiasco by Jeff Jacoby
Barney Frank’s talking points notwithstanding, mortgage lenders didn’t wake up one fine day deciding to junk long-held standards of creditworthiness in order to make ill-advised loans to unqualified borrowers. It would be closer to the truth to say they woke up to find the government twisting their arms and demanding that they do so – or else.
The roots of this crisis go back to the Carter administration. That was when government officials, egged on by left-wing activists, began accusing mortgage lenders of racism and “redlining” because urban blacks were being denied mortgages at a higher rate than suburban whites.
The pressure to make more loans to minorities (read: to borrowers with weak credit histories) became relentless. Congress passed the Community Reinvestment Act, empowering regulators to punish banks that failed to “meet the credit needs” of “low-income, minority, and distressed neighborhoods.” Lenders responded by loosening their underwriting standards and making increasingly shoddy loans. The two government-chartered mortgage finance firms, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, encouraged this “subprime” lending by authorizing ever more “flexible” criteria . . .
All this was justified as a means of increasing homeownership among minorities and the poor. Affirmative-action policies trumped sound business practices. A manual issued by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston advised mortgage lenders to disregard financial common sense. “Lack of credit history should not be seen as a negative factor,” the Fed’s guidelines instructed. Lenders were directed to accept welfare payments and unemployment benefits as “valid income sources” to qualify for a mortgage. Failure to comply could mean a lawsuit.
As long as housing prices kept rising, the illusion that all this was good public policy could be sustained. But it didn’t take a financial whiz to recognize that a day of reckoning would come. [...]
Time and time again, Frank insisted that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were in good shape. Five years ago, for example, when the Bush administration proposed much tighter regulation of the two companies, Frank was adamant that “these two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not facing any kind of financial crisis.” When the White House warned of “systemic risk for our financial system” unless the mortgage giants were curbed, Frank complained that the administration was more concerned about financial safety than about housing.
Now that the bubble has burst and the “systemic risk” is apparent to all, Frank blithely declares: “The private sector got us into this mess.” Well, give the congressman points for gall. Wall Street and private lenders have plenty to answer for, but it was Washington and the political class that derailed this train. If Frank is looking for a culprit to blame, he can find one suspect in the nearest mirror.
Meanwhile, in what can only be described as brass cojones, U.S. Democrats seek Wall Street tax in bailout plan.
How about we tax the Democrat Party for the Community Reinvestment Act?
Filed under: The Government Engineered Mortgage Crisis , AIG, Barney Frank, Bear Stearns, Bill Clinton, Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, Crazy liberals, Democrats, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Government engineered mortgage crisis, Jimmy Carter, Speaker Nancy Pelosi










